2007
DOI: 10.1206/0003-0082(2007)507[1:njmfpa]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Jurassic Mammals from Patagonia, Argentina: A Reappraisal of Australosphenidan Morphology and Interrelationships

Abstract: A new mammal, Henosferus molus, n.gen. and n.sp., from the Callovian-Oxfordian (latest Middle to earliest Late Jurassic) Cañadó n Asfalto Formation from Chubut Province (Argentina) is described. This taxon corresponds to a new species clearly different from Asfaltomylos patagonicus from the same locality and stratigraphic level. This new species is based on three lower jaws with relatively well-preserved dentition. The lower jaw shows a primitive morphology having a Meckelian groove, a prominent medial flange … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, all of the aforementioned trees united the Chinese ''primitive triconodont'' Hadrocodium with monotremes, contrary to the majority opinion (5,6,24,27,48) that monotreme affinities lie with the Gondwanan clade, Australosphenida. The original incarnation of the present morphological data sets (27) Backbone constraints were used to define these alternatives for morphol439 and morphol441, both with the remainder of the tree topology unconstrained or with monotremes constrained to group within Australosphenida (ЉAustra-losphenida-constrainedЉ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, all of the aforementioned trees united the Chinese ''primitive triconodont'' Hadrocodium with monotremes, contrary to the majority opinion (5,6,24,27,48) that monotreme affinities lie with the Gondwanan clade, Australosphenida. The original incarnation of the present morphological data sets (27) Backbone constraints were used to define these alternatives for morphol439 and morphol441, both with the remainder of the tree topology unconstrained or with monotremes constrained to group within Australosphenida (ЉAustra-losphenida-constrainedЉ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This angle is also absent on the dentary of Bishops and Henosferus [40,42]. The possible exception is Eomaia, whose dentary seems to have an angle in the same condition as that of Sasayamamylos [4].…”
Section: Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Revisions to the matrix were made on the basis of corrections and criticisms by Woodburne et al (2003), Rougier et al (2007), Rowe et al (2008) and Phillips et al (2009). The final matrix included 104 taxa and 438 characters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include: from the Aptian Flat Rocks locality in Victoria, the ausktribosphenids Ausktribosphenos nyktos (Rich et al, 1997) and Bishops whitmorei (Rich et al, 2001a), the monotreme Teinolophos trusleri (Rich et al, 1999(Rich et al, , 2001b, and the multituberculate Corriebaatar marywaltersae (Rich et al, 2009); from the Albian Dinosaur Cove locality in Victoria, the partial humerus of (the possible monotreme) Kryoryctes cadburyi (Pridmore et al, 2005); and from Lightning Ridge in New South Wales a very large, mammal-like isolated tooth (Clemens et al, 2003). Most recent phylogenetic analyses have placed ausktribosphenids and monotremes within a larger Gondwanan radiation termed Australosphenida (Luo et al, 2001(Luo et al, , 2002(Luo et al, , 2007aMartin and Rauhut, 2005;Rougier et al, 2011;Wood and Rougier, 2005), together with the early Jurassic (Toarcian) (Cúneo et al, 2013) South American Asfaltomylos (Rauhut et al, 2002) and Henosferus (Rougier et al, 2007), and the middle Jurassic (Bathonian) Ambondro mahabo (Flynn et al, 1999) from Madagascar. Some authors, however, have questioned the inclusion of monotremes within Australosphenida (Pascual et al, 2002;Rich et al, 2002;Rowe et al, 2008;Woodburne, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%