“…However, a bioinformatics study using a hidden Markov model succeeded to identify PET hydrolase genes using the UniProtKB database and more than 100 metagenome datasets, many of which originated from marine sources (Danso et al, 2018). The reported frequency of PET hydrolases was, dependent on the origin of the metagenomic sample, between 0.0001 and 1.5 hits per megabases of sequence, with the highest hit rate in a metagenome obtained from an oil polluted environment (Danso et al, 2018). In contrast to the marine origin of many predicted PET hydrolases, most of the PET degrading enzymes studied so far originate from terrestrial sources, with Cut190 from Saccharomonospora viridis (Kawai et al, 2014), Tha_Cut1 from Thermobifida alba (Ribitsch et al, 2012), Thc_Cut1 and Thc_Cut2 from T. cellulosilytica (Ribitsch et al, 2012), Tfu_0883, Tfu_0882 and TfCut2 from T. fusca (Chen et al, 2010;Roth et al, 2014) and LCC identified from a leafbranch compost metagenome (Sulaiman et al, 2012) for example.…”