Oxford Handbooks Online 2012
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560530.013.0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Governance and Policy Instruments: are Governments Going “Soft”?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These include, but are not limited to: distinguishing between monitoring and behaviour altering instruments (Hood, 1986), sorting carrots, sticks and sermons (Bemelmans-Videc et al, 2011); describing policy instruments as either hard or soft (cf. Zehavi, 2012); and categorizing policy instruments as either regulatory, fiscal, agreements or information (Lascoumes and Le Galès, 2007). To centre on the mix of new and traditional governance tools (cf.…”
Section: Theoretical Point Of Departurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include, but are not limited to: distinguishing between monitoring and behaviour altering instruments (Hood, 1986), sorting carrots, sticks and sermons (Bemelmans-Videc et al, 2011); describing policy instruments as either hard or soft (cf. Zehavi, 2012); and categorizing policy instruments as either regulatory, fiscal, agreements or information (Lascoumes and Le Galès, 2007). To centre on the mix of new and traditional governance tools (cf.…”
Section: Theoretical Point Of Departurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the usage and the exact meaning of the term governance varies across scientific literature, e.g., [19][20][21], the study adopts the analytical framework developed by the authors and colleagues [11,17,18] based on the concept of Integrated Sustainable Waste Management [22]. The framework distinguishes between the physical components (the 'What' dimension of a SWM system) and the governance (the 'How' and the 'Who' dimensions of a SWM system).…”
Section: Analytical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trata-se das narrativas sobre o "esvaziamento do Estado" ou da percepção de perda de controle do Estado sobre os processos de políticas públicas a partir da emergência e adensamento das interações entre os atores estatais, do mercado e da sociedade civil. A desagregação e fragmentação das estruturas burocráticas verticalizadas, além da transferência de responsabilidades e funções para a sociedade civil, governos subnacionais e para o mercado, foi compreendida por muitos analistas como perda de capacidade estatal, abrindo espaço para o maior protagonismo do mercado e da sociedade (Zehavi 2012).…”
Section: Capacidades Estatais E Governança No Contexto Das Transfunclassified