2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf03263224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Frame Shift Mutation in Puroindoline B in Indian Wheat Cultivars Hyb65 and NI5439

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Srivastava et al (2002) observed that higher moisture retention and starch gelatinization as a consequence of greater film forming ability of gluten in hard wheat flour resulted in pliable and soft textured chapati. Ram et al (2005) emphasized that the good chapati quality wheats like C 306 are likely to differ from present day cultivars in terms of the Pin allele constitution. The phenol reaction score for population 'A' showed 5 genotypes out of 70 to be better than C 273 (1.87) where as 65 genotypes were found to be inferior to PBW 343 (6.90).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Srivastava et al (2002) observed that higher moisture retention and starch gelatinization as a consequence of greater film forming ability of gluten in hard wheat flour resulted in pliable and soft textured chapati. Ram et al (2005) emphasized that the good chapati quality wheats like C 306 are likely to differ from present day cultivars in terms of the Pin allele constitution. The phenol reaction score for population 'A' showed 5 genotypes out of 70 to be better than C 273 (1.87) where as 65 genotypes were found to be inferior to PBW 343 (6.90).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pinb-D1b was the most frequent genotype in USA, Canadian, Norwegian, Japanese, South Korean and Chinese cultivars Ikeda et al 2005;Lillemo and Morris 2000;Morris et al 2001;Xia et al 2005). However, in CIMMYT and Indian cultivars, and Chinese landraces, Pina-D1b was the dominant genotype Lillemo et al 2006;Ram et al 2002Ram et al , 2005. Various new puroindoline alleles were identified, all resulting in a kernel hardness change from soft to hard Gazza et al 2005;Morris 1997, 1998;Lillemo and Morris 2000;Morris et al 2001;Ram et al 2005;Xia et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Pinb-D1e and Pinb-D1g, which are like Pinb-D1f null mutations because of the one point substitution to the stop codon (positions 39 and 56 respectively), were found in the same American historical wheats (Morris et al 2001b). Other Pinb-D1 null mutations, Pinb-D1h and Pinb-D1i (Ikeda et al 2005), Pinb-D1p , Pinb-D1r and Pinb-D1s (Ram et al 2005), and Pinb-D1u (Chang et al 2006;Chen et al 2007) are of the frame shift type (Table 2). Pinb-D1u has a different effect on grain hardness in different cultivars (hard or mixed grain texture).…”
Section: Allelic Variation and Molecular Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%