New educational technologies in tertiary education in India: adoption and consequences

Abstract

Purpose -The educational institutions in India have been experiencing new educational technologies (NET)-led technical change for the last two decades or so. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the use of NET (all possible forms of new technologies) and its impact on students enrolled in tertiary education institutions in India. The main objectives of the study are: to identify intensity of NET used by the students; to investigate whether use of NET is influenced by the financial nature of institution; and to examine the consequences of NET use. Design/methodology/approach -This study is based on a primary survey of seven higher education institutions located in National Capital Region of India. The universities included are both private and public funded. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 201 students in these universities. Advanced statistical techniques have been applied for the analysis. Findings -The study finds that the NET use enables students to communicate with their counterparts and faculty in a more effective manner. The use of digital technologies helps them to manage class activities in a better way. The NET use is found to be more relevant to engineering and science students which leads to better illustration of ideas and enhanced job prospects. The study finds that use of digital technologies is extensive in public-funded institutions. The significant contributions of NET use in improvement in learning are also found in the study.Research limitations/implications -The major limitation of this study is the small sample size. It was not possible to increase the sample of students due to financial constraint. It is recommended that future research with larger sample could prove the robustness of the findings. Another limitation is the coverage of students only. The future studies may include the analysis of teachers' views on NET adoption and its consequences. Originality/value -The present study is an original work of the authors.

Assessment framework for workforce agility in higher education institutions

“…The industry requirement of students' skills has changed. Technology disruptions like Massive open online courses (MOOCs), collaborative models, and hybrid learning (DiSalvio, 2012;HESWBL 12,6 Harden, 2013;Mazoue, 2013) have necessitated faculty members to build their technical capacity and reflect on innovative ways to incorporate them into teaching-learning, research and collaboration with stakeholders (Kukulska-Hulme, 2012;Lal and Paul, 2018). Faculty members are under continuous pressure to produce patentable research and innovations and mentor students in entrepreneurial initiatives (Dusen, 2013).…”

Enablers of workforce agility in engineering educational institutions

“…Refers to upgrading the existing skills and competencies of the faculty members or developing new skills and competencies in response to changes in the educational environment Capability to understand the diverse learning styles and abilities of students and plan the curriculum, pedagogical approach, evaluation and assessment criteria accordingly Dove and Willis (1996); Paulson (2002) Capability to read and interpret external environmental changes and capability for independent and collaborative learning Breu et al (2002) The agile workforce should have the ability to solve problems, negotiate, work under stress and non-routine circumstances, generate new ideas, have a positive attitude toward learning and show readiness to accept new roles and responsibilities Sherehiy et al (2007) Workforce with multiple competencies and multitasking abilities Sherehiy and Karwowski (2014) The ability of the workforce to renew its capacity and capability in response to the changes in the environment makes the workforce agile Qin and Nembhard (2015) (continued ) Philbin (2015) Capability to use information radiators (Kanban boards) to improve communication and track the progress of research projects that are multidisciplinary in nature Philbin (2015) Capability to leverage collaborative networks for education and research purposes Tan (2016); Lal and Paul (2018) (continued ) for providing solutions to teaching-learning innovations ,collaborating with alumni and with national and international universities are ways universities leverage from partnerships Mukerjee (2014) Online teacher collaboration enables teachers to improve their teaching practice and enriches their learning as a result of sharing and exchanging of ideas and knowledge Romeu et al(2016) 7.…”

Recognizing leadership styles through the use of a serious game

“…As Mense et al (2018) point out, learning is not about holding and memorizing information but transforming and restructuring it to understand the world around us. Furthermore, Lal and Paul (2018) point out that digital technologies combined with active methodologies enable students to better manage their different learning paces.…”