2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53278_4.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New Bases for Percutaneous Caval Filter Placement on Site in Geriatric Institution in Patients Aged 75 and Older

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Caval filtration was performed for wellaccepted therapeutic indications in 93% of cases. [1][2][3][4] The only case of PE during the implantation period occurred in a patient whose filter migrated early after placement. Entrapment of thrombus was documented in 24 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Caval filtration was performed for wellaccepted therapeutic indications in 93% of cases. [1][2][3][4] The only case of PE during the implantation period occurred in a patient whose filter migrated early after placement. Entrapment of thrombus was documented in 24 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional indications for vena cava interruption involve situations in which anticoagulant treatment (ACT) is not considered adequate or appropriate, including contraindications to ACT in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower extremities, as well as development of pulmonary embolism (PE) despite ACT. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] These critical situations are often transient, especially in surgical, obstetric, and trauma settings. Placement of permanent filters in patients with transient indications demands caution because the initial benefits may be canceled out by long-term drawbacks, such as recurrent DVT [9][10][11] or complications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%