2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurophysiological, psychological and behavioural correlates of rTMS treatment in alcohol dependence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(Gay et al, ). Similar results were found for people with alcohol dependence (Del Felice et al, ), with HF rTMS over the left DLPFC improving performance of a cognitive inhibition control task but ineffective at reducing alcohol intake. We can only speculate on these results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Gay et al, ). Similar results were found for people with alcohol dependence (Del Felice et al, ), with HF rTMS over the left DLPFC improving performance of a cognitive inhibition control task but ineffective at reducing alcohol intake. We can only speculate on these results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These results agree with the few studies available in clinical samples. Del Felice et al () found that HF rTMS over the left DLPFC improved inhibitory control in alcohol dependence. Similarly, McClelland et al () found that HF rTMS over the left DLPFC transiently reduced core symptoms of anorexia nervosa and encouraged prudent decision‐making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only studies whose primary and/or secondary outcomes were related to substance use outcomes (ie, consumption, abstinence, craving, and withdrawal) or drug cue‐induced neurophysiological/functional imaging changes were included in this review. This process yielded 69 studies, of which nine were excluded that did not meet these criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the present protocol delivered 20 rTMS pulses using inter-train intervals of 10 or 11 s. On the one hand, the current safety guideline considers 5 s or longer intertrain intervals to be safe up to 110% motor threshold [24]. Yet, 10 Hz rTMS studies usually employ substantially longer inter-train intervals that are in the range of 20 to 68 s [e.g., 25,26]. One can avoid this potential safety concern in future studies by at least doubling the inter-train intervals used in the present study.…”
Section: Relation Of Electric Field Strengths To Previous Tacs and Rtmentioning
confidence: 99%