1995
DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NeuroNames Brain Hierarchy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
84
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…org; examples are available in Appendices 1-5 and Metadata 1-5, which are published as supporting information on the PNAS web site.) In addition, the anatomical hierarchy of the Neuro Names taxonomy (16) has been included as a user-friendly query tool within the database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…org; examples are available in Appendices 1-5 and Metadata 1-5, which are published as supporting information on the PNAS web site.) In addition, the anatomical hierarchy of the Neuro Names taxonomy (16) has been included as a user-friendly query tool within the database.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each publication indexed, the reported groups and individuals are characterized with respect to the demographic, clinical and anatomic measurements reported. To facilitate interdatabase federation, many elements of the database are related to 'concept' entries in the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) [Hole & Srinivasan, 2003] including the anatomic nomenclature (through NeuroNames [Bowden and Martin, 1995;Bowden and Dubach, 2003]] and diagnosis codes (DSM-4 and ICD-10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the theoretical level, one would need to establish a set of data types and characterize how these types relate to one other. Even then, it is unclear whether in practice such a general scheme would be adopted by researchers; e.g., different research centers would need to agree on a common nomenclature for naming cortical regions, possibly within a larger context of a hierarchy of brain structures (e.g., NeuroNames, Bowden & Martin, 1995). In absence of such agreements, any such implementation would need to incorporate flexibility, such as accommodating multiple anatomical labelings for the same data (cf.…”
Section: Standards Conventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%