2011
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurofunctional and Behavioral Correlates of Phonetic and Temporal Categorization in Musically Trained and Untrained Subjects

Abstract: The perception of rapidly changing verbal and nonverbal auditory patterns is a fundamental prerequisite for speech and music processing. Previously, the left planum temporale (PT) has been consistently shown to support the discrimination of fast changing verbal and nonverbal sounds. Furthermore, it has been repeatedly shown that the functional and structural architecture of this supratemporal brain region differs as a function of musical training. In the present study, we used the functional magnetic resonance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

8
86
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
8
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The planum polare is involved in controlling prosodic and attentionrelated auditory processes (Jäncke, Buchanan, Lutz, & Shah, 2001;Meyer, Friederici, & von Cramon, 2000), and the STS is a brain area known to integrate information from different modalities (Oechslin et al, 2010;Hugdahl, Løberg, & Nygård, 2009;Schulze et al, 2009;Hein & Knight, 2008). Interestingly, the left-sided STS region, where we identified a strong hub in AP musicians, is strongly involved in phonetic, linguistic, and prosodic processing especially in AP (Oechslin et al, 2010) and RP musicians (Elmer et al, 2012). Finally, the inferior frontal gyrus is involved in higher-order phonological processing, analysis of semantic information, auditorymotor mapping, and feedforward and feedback control of vocal production (Tourville, Reilly, & Guenther, 2008;Lahav, Saltzman, & Schlaug, 2007;Noesselt, Shah, & Jäncke, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The planum polare is involved in controlling prosodic and attentionrelated auditory processes (Jäncke, Buchanan, Lutz, & Shah, 2001;Meyer, Friederici, & von Cramon, 2000), and the STS is a brain area known to integrate information from different modalities (Oechslin et al, 2010;Hugdahl, Løberg, & Nygård, 2009;Schulze et al, 2009;Hein & Knight, 2008). Interestingly, the left-sided STS region, where we identified a strong hub in AP musicians, is strongly involved in phonetic, linguistic, and prosodic processing especially in AP (Oechslin et al, 2010) and RP musicians (Elmer et al, 2012). Finally, the inferior frontal gyrus is involved in higher-order phonological processing, analysis of semantic information, auditorymotor mapping, and feedforward and feedback control of vocal production (Tourville, Reilly, & Guenther, 2008;Lahav, Saltzman, & Schlaug, 2007;Noesselt, Shah, & Jäncke, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These brain areas are all known to be involved in higher-order auditory processing, working memory, language and semantic memory processes, and auditory-motor mapping as well as in feedforward and feedback control of vocal production. The planum temporale is conceptualized as a "computational" hub for the processing of complex auditory stimuli (Griffiths & Warren, 2002) and responds differently in AP musicians in the context of auditory information processing (Elmer, Meyer, & Jäncke, 2012;Ohnishi et al, 2001). The planum polare is involved in controlling prosodic and attentionrelated auditory processes (Jäncke, Buchanan, Lutz, & Shah, 2001;Meyer, Friederici, & von Cramon, 2000), and the STS is a brain area known to integrate information from different modalities (Oechslin et al, 2010;Hugdahl, Løberg, & Nygård, 2009;Schulze et al, 2009;Hein & Knight, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These transfer effects possibly arise because speech and music are auditory signals relying on similar acoustic cues (i.e., duration, frequency, intensity, and timbre) and because they share, at least in part, common neuronal substrates for auditory perception (Peretz, Vuvan, Lagrois, & Armony, 2015;Jäncke, 2009) and for higher-order cognitive processing (Rogalsky, Rong, Saberi, & Hickok, 2011;Patel, 2008;Maess, Koelsch, Gunter, & Friederici, 2001). For instance, music training facilitates the processing of a variety of segmental (Bidelman, Weiss, Moreno, & Alain, 2014;Kühnis, Elmer, & Jäncke, 2014;Elmer, Meyer, & Jäncke, 2012;Chobert, Marie, François, Schön, & Besson, 2011;Musacchia, Sams, Skoe, & Kraus, 2007) and suprasegmental speech attributes (Marie, Delogu, Lampis, Olivetti Belardinelli, & Besson, 2011;Wong & Perrachione, 2007) within native (Schön, Magne, & Besson, 2004) and nonnative languages (Marques, Moreno, Castro, & Besson, 2007). Moreover, both musically trained children (Jentschke & Koelsch, 2009) and adults (Fitzroy & Sanders, 2013) are more sensitive to violations of linguistic and music syntax than participants without music training.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such plastic changes can be found at the macroanatomical (Elmer, Hänggi, Meyer, & Jäncke, 2013;Bermudez, Lerch, Evans, & Zatorre, 2009;Schneider et al, 2005) as well as at the functional (Kühnis, Elmer, Meyer, & Jäncke, 2013b;Ellis et al, 2012;Elmer, Meyer, & Jäncke, 2012;Marie, Kujala, & Besson, 2012;Schneider et al, 2005) level and often correlate fairly well with the age of commencement of musical training (Pantev et al, 1998), the years of training (Musacchia, Sams, Skoe, & Kraus, 2007), or even with the cumulative hours of training (Elmer et al, 2012). Therefore, it is not really surprising that training-related changes in auditoryrelated brain regions of musicians strengthen the faculty to perceive or categorize musical sounds (Elmer, Klein, Kühnis, Liem, Meyer, & Jäncke, 2014;Meyer, Baumann, & Jäncke, 2006;Pantev, Roberts, Schulz, Engelien, & Ross, 2001) or even temporal and spectral (Kühnis, Elmer, Meyer, & Jäncke, 2013a;Kühnis et al, 2013b;Elmer et al, 2012;Marie et al, 2012;Marie, Delogu, Lampis, Belardinelli, & Besson, 2011;Marie, Magne, & Besson, 2011) speech information. However, from a methodological point of view, it is important to differentiate between active (i.e., discrimination or categorization) tasks and passive listening paradigms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%