1988
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(88)90054-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neurobehavioral functioning in children exposed to narcotics in Utero

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant effect sizes were in the range of approximately 0.5 to 0.9 standard deviations. The combination of cognitive functions within the normal range but significantly worse than a non-exposed group is in accordance with previous studies of young children with prenatal opioid or poly-drug exposure (Bauman & Levine, 1986;Bunikowski et al, 1998;Hans & Jeremy, 2001;Hunt et al, 2008;Johnson et al, 1984;Logan et al, 2011;van Baar & de Graaff, 1994;Wilson, 1989;Wilson et al, 1979) and youths with such prenatal exposure (Davis & Templer, 1988;Ornoy et al, 2010).…”
Section: Cognitive Scores and Group Differencessupporting
confidence: 79%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The significant effect sizes were in the range of approximately 0.5 to 0.9 standard deviations. The combination of cognitive functions within the normal range but significantly worse than a non-exposed group is in accordance with previous studies of young children with prenatal opioid or poly-drug exposure (Bauman & Levine, 1986;Bunikowski et al, 1998;Hans & Jeremy, 2001;Hunt et al, 2008;Johnson et al, 1984;Logan et al, 2011;van Baar & de Graaff, 1994;Wilson, 1989;Wilson et al, 1979) and youths with such prenatal exposure (Davis & Templer, 1988;Ornoy et al, 2010).…”
Section: Cognitive Scores and Group Differencessupporting
confidence: 79%
“…As found in previous studies (Bernstein et al, 1984;Bunikowski et al, 1998;Davis & Templer, 1988;Hans, 1989;Hans & Jeremy, 2001;Logan et al, 2011;Wahlsten & Sarman, 2013), the drug-exposed group had significantly worse fine motor functioning than the non-exposed group. However, the results were within the normal range, and the differences between the groups were not larger than the differences in general cognitive abilities.…”
Section: Non-specific Problems With Executive Functions and Fine Motosupporting
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations