2016
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuroanatomical Alterations in Tinnitus Assessed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract: Previous studies of anatomical changes associated with tinnitus have provided inconsistent results, with some showing significant cortical and subcortical changes, while others have found effects due to hearing loss, but not tinnitus. In this study, we examined changes in brain anatomy associated with tinnitus using anatomical scans from 128 participants with tinnitus and hearing loss, tinnitus with clinically normal hearing, and non-tinnitus controls with clinically normal hearing. The groups were matched for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(108 reference statements)
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None of the studies discussed sample size justification or power calculations. Nine of the studies explicitly stated their subjects’ tinnitus severity, while four mentioned which severity score they used, but did not include the actual score (Allen et al 2016, Leaver et al 2011, Leaver et al 2012, Melcher et al 2013). …”
Section: 0 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…None of the studies discussed sample size justification or power calculations. Nine of the studies explicitly stated their subjects’ tinnitus severity, while four mentioned which severity score they used, but did not include the actual score (Allen et al 2016, Leaver et al 2011, Leaver et al 2012, Melcher et al 2013). …”
Section: 0 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies did not use any control groups and analyzed brain volume changes of tinnitus using only regression models (Schecklmann et al 2012, Schecklmann et al 2013, Vanneste et al 2015). Three of the studies that used controls had controls with hearing loss and with normal hearing (Allan et al 2016, Boyen et al 2013, Husain et al 2011). The other seven studies used a single control group in their VBM study (Krick et al 2015, Landgrebe et al 2009, Leaver et al, 2011, Leaver et al 2012, Mahoney et al 2011, Melcher et al 2013, Mühlau et al 2005).…”
Section: 0 Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations