2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neuro-cognitive architecture of executive functions: A latent variable analysis

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Computational modeling offers a technique to decompose behavior on neuropsychological assessment instruments into assumed latent cognitive processes, allowing inferences closer to the level of covert cognitive processes [ 41 , 46 ]. Importantly, latent variables, which reflect the efficacy of covert cognitive processes, are unambiguously defined (see Appendix B ) and, thereby, may replace the traditional verbal constructs of neuropsychological assessment [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. The present study exemplifies that latent variables obtained from computational modeling may provide indicators of shared latent symptoms as well as nosologically specific differentiable facets of latent executive dysfunctions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Computational modeling offers a technique to decompose behavior on neuropsychological assessment instruments into assumed latent cognitive processes, allowing inferences closer to the level of covert cognitive processes [ 41 , 46 ]. Importantly, latent variables, which reflect the efficacy of covert cognitive processes, are unambiguously defined (see Appendix B ) and, thereby, may replace the traditional verbal constructs of neuropsychological assessment [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. The present study exemplifies that latent variables obtained from computational modeling may provide indicators of shared latent symptoms as well as nosologically specific differentiable facets of latent executive dysfunctions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational cognitive neuropsychology offers an approach to decompose behavior that was observed on neuropsychological assessment instruments into covert cognitive processes [ 41 , 46 ]. Computational cognitive neuropsychology utilizes mathematical formalization of (1) the assumed covert cognitive processes, and (2) the way in which these processes interact [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. Analyzing behavior on a neuropsychological assessment instrument, such as the WCST, via computational modeling allows estimating a set of latent variables, which reflect the efficacy of the assumed covert cognitive processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, multiple measures of the same construct are necessary to obtain an estimate of the underlying EF, above and beyond the task specifics. We used this approach in several of our studies (e.g., Ambrosini, Arbula, Rossato, Pacella, & Vallesi, 2019;Tarantino, Mazzonetto, Formica, Causin, & Vallesi, 2017;Capizzi, Ambrosini, Arbula, Mazzonetto, & Vallesi, 2016a;Babcock & Vallesi, 2015;Capizzi, Fehér, Penolazzi, & Vallesi, 2015;Vallesi, Arbula, Capizzi, Causin, & D'Avella, 2015). In some cases (e.g., Furlan, Babcock, & Vallesi, 2018;Capizzi et al, 2016a;Capizzi, Ambrosini, Arbula, Mazzonetto, & Vallesi, 2016b), we kept task material constant and only changed the nature of the task that participants had to perform on this material (and consequently the required EF).…”
Section: Studies On Left Lateralization Of Criterion Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given all the accumulated evidence reviewed above, we used a confirmatory factor analysis to "close the loop," as Don Stuss used to say, by formally testing multiple theoretical models on how the two investigated executive processes might interact with the task domain (Ambrosini et al, 2019). Previous factor analysis works on EF were usually uninformative regarding how the models corroborated through factor analysis might be implemented in the brain.…”
Section: Toward a Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Executive functions can be described as the higher order or metacognitive functions that are utilized to regulate a self-directed set of purpose-oriented actions in novel or nonhabitual situations [ 12 , 13 ]. These functions, which also enable an individual to flexibly regulate and control his or her own mind and behavior to achieve goals through the operation of fundamental cognitive processes [ 14 ], may be regarded as a significant characteristic of elite athletes. For example, athletes, regardless of whether they play self-paced sports (e.g., golf, bowling, and archery) or externally paced sports (e.g., tennis, baseball), have been found to achieve higher scores on executive function-related tasks than nonathletes [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%