2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-131x(200004)19:3<177::aid-for738>3.0.co;2-6
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Neural networks and the multinomial logit for brand choice modelling: a hybrid approach
Abstract: The study of brand choice decisions with multiple alternatives has been successfully modelled for more than a decade using the Multinomial Logit model. Recently, neural network modelling has received increasing attention and has been applied to an array of marketing problems such as market response or segmentation. We show that a Feedforward Neural Network with Softmax output units and shared weights can be viewed as a generalization of the Multinomial Logit model. The main dierence between the two approaches …
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
112
16
0
0
Citation Types
1
70
0
0
Year Published
2003
2026
Publication Types
Select...
92
23
5
3
Relationship
0
123
Authors
Journals
Cited by 123 publications
(71 citation statements)
References 43 publications
1
70
0
0
“…This is generally true; however, in the case of DNN, an accurate estimator of the choice probability function ŝ(x) could satisfy most of our interpretation purposes traditionally achieved through using ŵ. In fact, several studies in the transportation field have visualized or computed the gradient information of the choice probability functions to interpret the ML classifiers, supporting our definition of the interpretation loss based on the choice probability functions [53,9,27]. Moreover, the process of interpretting elasticity ds dx j is the same as the discussion of using input gradients in the ML community [3,43].…”
Section: Interpretation Losssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This is generally true; however, in the case of DNN, an accurate estimator of the choice probability function ŝ(x) could satisfy most of our interpretation purposes traditionally achieved through using ŵ. In fact, several studies in the transportation field have visualized or computed the gradient information of the choice probability functions to interpret the ML classifiers, supporting our definition of the interpretation loss based on the choice probability functions [53,9,27]. Moreover, the process of interpretting elasticity ds dx j is the same as the discussion of using input gradients in the ML community [3,43].…”
Section: Interpretation Losssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…It is often referred to by different names such as sensitivity analysis, saliency, or attribution maps in computer vision [84,51], or attention mechanism in natural language processing [103]. In the transportation field, some studies used input gradients to describe the relationship between inputs and outputs in DNNs [13,76,37]. Recently, researchers in the ML community are increasingly focusing their attention on the properties of DNNs' input gradients, owing to their importance in DNN interpretation [87,82,90,79].…”
Section: Interpretation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bentz and Merunkay also showed that Copyright © 2013 MECS I.J. Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 2013, 5, 49-56neural networks did better than multinomial logistic regression(Bentz 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
