2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.04463
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Latents Benchmark '21: Evaluating latent variable models of neural population activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This dataset contains 108 different reach configurations over nearly 3000 trials, and has recently been proposed as a neuroscience benchmark for neural data analysis methods (Pei et al, 2021). We compared the performance of iLQR-VAE to several other latent variable models, evaluated on this dataset in Pei et al (2021).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This dataset contains 108 different reach configurations over nearly 3000 trials, and has recently been proposed as a neuroscience benchmark for neural data analysis methods (Pei et al, 2021). We compared the performance of iLQR-VAE to several other latent variable models, evaluated on this dataset in Pei et al (2021).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conditioning of 137 neurons (i.e using 45 held-out neurons), we obtained a co-smoothing of 0.331 ± 0.001 (over 5 random seeds). For comparison, Pei et al (2021) reports 0.187 for GPFA (Yu et al, 2009), 0.225 for SLDS (Linderman et al, 2017), 0.329 for Neural Data Transformers (Ye and Pandarinath, 2021) and R 2 = 0.346 for AutoLFADS (LFADS with large scale hyperparameter optimization; Keshtkaran et al, 2021) on the same dataset.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations