2019
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2018.2870159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Inverse Optimal Control Implementation for Induction Motors via Rapid Control Prototyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1) Generating the optimal torque command [140] or the optimal flux level/d-axis current reference [14], [141]- [143]; 2) Achieving robust controller response for induction machines against load disturbances [144], [145] and parameter variations [146]; 3) Synthesizing PWM signals for two-level [114], [137], [147] or three-level [148] voltage-fed induction machine drives; 4) Producing optimal air gap flux distribution with harmonic current injection for nontriplen multi-phase induction machines [149]; 5) Formulating an MRAS for sensorless vector-controlled IM drives based on the stator current error [150], [151], as well as the instantaneous and steady state reactive power [152]; 6) Developing full-order and reduced-order speed observers with a total least squares technique based on the minor component analysis EXIN + neuron [153]- [155]; 7) Accomplishing maximum power point tracking in induction-machine-based wind generators [156], [157]; 8) Correcting the estimated rotor speed in a sensorless nonlinear control scheme [158] of induction motors [159]; 9) Optimizing an extended Kalman filter for speed and rotor flux estimation of IM drives using particle swarm optimization [160]. 10) Performing online identification and parameter estimation of induction motors [161]- [168].…”
Section: F Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Generating the optimal torque command [140] or the optimal flux level/d-axis current reference [14], [141]- [143]; 2) Achieving robust controller response for induction machines against load disturbances [144], [145] and parameter variations [146]; 3) Synthesizing PWM signals for two-level [114], [137], [147] or three-level [148] voltage-fed induction machine drives; 4) Producing optimal air gap flux distribution with harmonic current injection for nontriplen multi-phase induction machines [149]; 5) Formulating an MRAS for sensorless vector-controlled IM drives based on the stator current error [150], [151], as well as the instantaneous and steady state reactive power [152]; 6) Developing full-order and reduced-order speed observers with a total least squares technique based on the minor component analysis EXIN + neuron [153]- [155]; 7) Accomplishing maximum power point tracking in induction-machine-based wind generators [156], [157]; 8) Correcting the estimated rotor speed in a sensorless nonlinear control scheme [158] of induction motors [159]; 9) Optimizing an extended Kalman filter for speed and rotor flux estimation of IM drives using particle swarm optimization [160]. 10) Performing online identification and parameter estimation of induction motors [161]- [168].…”
Section: F Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diverse important speed controllers for induction motors based on Neural Networks (NNs) have been proposed in the literature (see, e.g., [9,[36][37][38][39] and references therein). However, robust induction motor controllers are predominantly implemented by commercial conventional power converters, which provoke undesirable harmonic distortion of voltage and current waveforms [22].…”
Section: Difference With Other Important Induction Motor Controllers Based On Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System identification, trajectory tracking, and state estimation of induction motors are addressed in [39]. The results are based on neural inverse optimal controller, where the control objective is to track references for rotor speed and square rotor flux magnitude.…”
Section: Neural Adaptive Control Gainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PI controller output will be a reference signal for the Parker DC drive which is the actuator of the speed control system. It is important to indicate that although several advanced control techniques could be used to improve the performance of the speed regulation [24], [25], the standard PI controller was selected due to its well-known simplicity and reliability for this type of application. In this work, any possible decrease in the alternator generating performance in terms of torque and dynamic response [26] due to the performance of the DC machine is neglected in the present work.…”
Section: Speed Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%