2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2004.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural adaptive stereo matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of stereo matching has recruited a variation of computation tools. Advanced computational intelligence techniques are not uncommon and present interesting and promiscuous results (Binaghi et al 2004;.…”
Section: Energy Function I Imentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The issue of stereo matching has recruited a variation of computation tools. Advanced computational intelligence techniques are not uncommon and present interesting and promiscuous results (Binaghi et al 2004;.…”
Section: Energy Function I Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binaghi (Binaghi et al 2004) on the other hand, have chosen to use the zero mean normalized cross correlation (ZNCC) as matching cost. This method integrates a neural network (NN) model, which uses the least-mean-square delta rule for training.…”
Section: Dense Disparity Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3c). In fact, other approaches to measure the displacements could be applied instead of DIC (edge detection, for instance; Binaghi et al 2004). This variation would allow applying this 3D reconstruction method in samples with low general contrast and only appearance of lines indicative of abrupt height changes between relatively flat and contrastless regions.…”
Section: Accuracy and Drawbacks Of The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binaghi et al raised an advanced method which utilizes zero mean normalized cross correlation i.e. ZNCC metric which combined with the techniques in the field of neural network [13]. The neural network in this method is applied for each support region, depending on the shape and size of each window.…”
Section: The Learning Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%