Networks and social capital in the UK television industry: The weakness of weak ties

Abstract

Accounts of the shift to post-industrial modes of employment have tended to present an over-simplified view of networks as an assemblage of contacts used to gain individual advantage in the labour market. Creative industries represent a challenge to this as typically they rely on networks to foster collaboration, trust and co-operation. In this article we explore how a variety of networks are used to promote both individual competition and co-operation in an industry where re-regulation has resulted in the break up of bureaucratic organizations and widespread casualization of the labour market. We argue that there is a need to extend the debate on the role of networks in a casualized labour market to examine how individuals organize themselves via the plethora of networks that result from organizational break up.We use qualitative data from a series of interviews with freelance television production workers in the United Kingdom to suggest that workers use networks as a source of competitive advantage and, at the same time, support and co-operation. Overall our research suggests that network activity is more complex, and networks themselves more dynamic, than existing research and theory implies.

Putting the Agent into Research in Black and Minority Ethnic Entrepreneurship

“…This approach, which is often used to explore entrepreneurial careers more generally (Grabher, 2001(Grabher, , 2002a(Grabher, , 2002bEkinsmyth, 2002;Antcliff, et al 2007;Adams and Demaiter, 2008), suggests successful bricolage depends on the nature of the resources or forms of capital at the disposal of BME entrepreneurs (see Ram et al 2008). Bourdieu extends the term 'capital' to refer to all the material and symbolic goods that are rare and worthy of being sought after in a particular social formation, discriminating between four types of capital: briefly (1) economic capital indicates access to material resources, (2) social capital indicates access to benefits and favours from more or less formal social ties, (3) cultural capital indicates knowledge and skills acquired via education and experiences, and (4) symbolic capital indicates prestige and honour derived from personal attributes, including qualifications and group membership.…”

All work and no pay: consequences of unpaid work in the creative industries

“…Forming and maintaining professional contacts, networks has been found to be crucial in recruitment and selection in the creative industries, but it is also important in career development and knowledge sharing for individuals already in the sector (Daskalaki, 2010). The value of network ties has often been conceptualised as social capital (Antcliff et al 2007;Bourdieu, 1983;Vershinina et al 2011). Because of the 'social mechanisms' of allocation of work in the creative industries (Baumann, 2002) access to networks, may advantage some individuals, or cause social exclusion of those who do not have this access (Oakley, 2006).…”

Riding the Practice Waves: Social Resourcing Practices during New Venture Development

“…Through the emphasis on habitus as a strongly structuring force, the focus of these accounts lies on the entrepreneur working in a "knowledgeable, reflexive and strategic" fashion (Terjesen & Elam, 2009, p. 1115 to mould their social environments in such a way as to maximize different forms of individually held capital (Antcliff, Saundry & Stuart, 2007).…”