2022 International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/nana56854.2022.00102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Security Situation Assessment Method Based on Absorbing Markov Chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Number of 0 degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (0,0.5] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (0.5,1] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (1,2] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (2,3] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (3,5] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (5,7] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (7,+inf) degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Table 4 Results of the search 0 (0, 0.5] (0.5, 1] ( The eight tertiary indicators are all negative indicators since more SFOR need to be coordinated, which makes coordination more difficult. The raw data are normalized using Equation (3) to produce the normalization matrix that is shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Difficulty Of Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Number of 0 degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (0,0.5] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (0.5,1] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (1,2] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (2,3] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (3,5] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (5,7] degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Number of (7,+inf) degree orbital intervals need to be coordinated Table 4 Results of the search 0 (0, 0.5] (0.5, 1] ( The eight tertiary indicators are all negative indicators since more SFOR need to be coordinated, which makes coordination more difficult. The raw data are normalized using Equation (3) to produce the normalization matrix that is shown in Table 5.…”
Section: Difficulty Of Coordinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the feature analysis of satellite network coordination factors and the use of a convolutional neural network as an algorithmic model, Gao [3] proposes a satellite network orbit evaluation strategy based on a machine learning algorithm for satellite network coordination analysis and resource reserve. Zhou [4] evaluates and analyzes the frequency and orbit information corresponding to the demand band using the AHP method and a fuzzy integrated evaluation approach with a one-vote multiplicative factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%