2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13100-019-0186-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nested plant LTR retrotransposons target specific regions of other elements, while all LTR retrotransposons often target palindromes and nucleosome-occupied regions: in silico study

Abstract: BackgroundNesting is common in LTR retrotransposons, especially in large genomes containing a high number of elements.ResultsWe analyzed 12 plant genomes and obtained 1491 pairs of nested and original (pre-existing) LTR retrotransposons. We systematically analyzed mutual nesting of individual LTR retrotransposons and found that certain families, more often belonging to the Ty3/gypsy than Ty1/copia superfamilies, showed a higher nesting frequency as well as a higher preference for older copies of the same famil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each TE is distributed in the plant genome with a specific insertion preference [130]. LTR-RTEs, such as the Ty3/gypsy and Ty1/copia superfamilies, are present in the centromere regions of the plant genome and play significant and perilous parts in the formation and function of centromeres [12,106,131].…”
Section: Distribution Of Tes In the Plant Genomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each TE is distributed in the plant genome with a specific insertion preference [130]. LTR-RTEs, such as the Ty3/gypsy and Ty1/copia superfamilies, are present in the centromere regions of the plant genome and play significant and perilous parts in the formation and function of centromeres [12,106,131].…”
Section: Distribution Of Tes In the Plant Genomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that nesting of LTR-RTEs is not random and depends on chromatin modifications. Class II TEs can also lead to TE nesting, although nesting is common in LTR-RTEs [130].…”
Section: Distribution Of Tes In the Plant Genomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the Gypsy superfamily accounts for over half the size of the T. arvense genome assembly, and the athila and crm lineages made a great proportion to the proliferation of the Gypsy superfamily ( Figure 2A and Table 2 ). For further study of the evolution of LTR-RTs, nested LTR-RTs and relevant pipelines should be considered ( Jedlicka et al, 2019 ; Lexa et al, 2020 ). Overall, LTR-RT proliferation largely contributes to the enlargement of the T. arvense genome size, which is consistent with a recent report ( Geng et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be gene-poor heterochromatic regions for some TE families, or open, transcriptionally active regions for others [23,77]. Examples of TEs inserting favorably in transcriptionally active regions in plants are Mutator elements in maize [78] and mPing MITEs in rice [54], while helitrons preferentially insert in intergenic regions [79] and LTR retrotransposons show a higher preference to insert into older copies of the same family [80]. Nevertheless, it is important to note that selection may obscure initial insertion preferences, so the picture we have now may be biased [23].…”
Section: Tes Facilitate Transcription Factor Network Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%