2004
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00137.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nerve regeneration-induced recovery of quinine avoidance after complete gustatory deafferentation of the tongue

Abstract: The concentration-dependent decrease in quinine licking by rats is substantially attenuated by combined bilateral transection of the chorda tympani (CT) and glossopharyngeal (GL) nerves, but transection of either nerve alone produces marginal impairments at most. Here we tested whether regeneration of one or both of these nerves after combined transection would result in recovery of taste avoidance. Water-restricted rats were presented with a series of brief-access (5 s) taste trials (water and 0.003-3.0 mM qu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When both the GL and CT were cut simultaneously, avoidance threshold increased still further (by 1.8 log 10 units). This is somewhat larger than the within-subject shifts of 1.18 and 1.35 log 10 units reported for CTX + GLX rats with pre-surgical quinine experience (Geran, Garcea, & Spector, 2004; St John, Garcea, & Spector, 1994), suggesting that the remaining quinine avoidance with combined CT+GL transection, presumably due to GSP input, may be improved with presurgical conditioning. However, given that these are separate studies with differing parameters we cannot say for sure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When both the GL and CT were cut simultaneously, avoidance threshold increased still further (by 1.8 log 10 units). This is somewhat larger than the within-subject shifts of 1.18 and 1.35 log 10 units reported for CTX + GLX rats with pre-surgical quinine experience (Geran, Garcea, & Spector, 2004; St John, Garcea, & Spector, 1994), suggesting that the remaining quinine avoidance with combined CT+GL transection, presumably due to GSP input, may be improved with presurgical conditioning. However, given that these are separate studies with differing parameters we cannot say for sure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Taste pores in fungiform papillae were stained with methylene blue and counted under a light microscope to confirm CTX (see Parks & Whitehead, 1998; Spector, Schwartz, & Grill, 1990) while circumvallate tissue was embedded in paraffin, cut into 5 −10 um sections, mounted and stained using a hemoxylin/eosin procedure to confirm GLX (Guth, 1957; Spector & Grill, 1992). A taste bud was counted in the circumvallate papilla if there was a visible taste pore or a group of well-organized elongated cells very close to the trench, suggesting the apical taste pore was just out of the plane of section (Geran, Garcea, & Spector, 2004). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, taste buds, which degenerate upon interruption of the nerve supply, reappear when a transected lingual taste nerve regenerates and reinnervates its native receptor field (Barry and Frank, 1992). Notably, for the most part, taste functions that are disrupted upon nerve transection, are restored once the nerve successfully reinnervates its normal epithelial region (Barry et al, 1993; Cain et al, 1996; St John et al, 1995; King et al, 2000; Kopka et al, 2000; Kopka and Spector, 2001; Yasumatsu et al, 2003; Geran et al, 2004). For the chorda tympani nerve (CT), this recovery of function occurs despite the seemingly permanent anatomical alterations in the gustatory system following regeneration including: decreases in the number of anterior tongue taste buds and their volume (Shuler et al, 2004), decreases in the number of myelinated fibers in the regenerated CT coupled with decreased number of cell bodies in the geniculate ganglion (Cain et al, 1996), and reduced volume and density of the CT terminal projection field in the nucleus of the solitary tract (Barry, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, when lingual taste nerves are cut, taste buds in the denervated oral region degenerate, either partially or completely, depending on the species, and the transected fibers regenerate to reinnervate their native receptor field (e.g., 8,9,12,13,19,23,39,55,58,60). Following reinnervation of the epithelium by the nerve fibers, the taste buds return and in the rodents examined, behavioral function is restored (e.g., 3,4,6,14,27,29,30,45). Such plasticity is indeed remarkable, but it is unclear whether the recovered function is dependent upon the tongue receptor field being reinnervated (the source of the input) or upon the nerve and the central circuits it supplies, or both.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%