Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Outcomes Following the Norwood Procedure: An Analysis of the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial Public Data Set

Abstract

BackgroundChildren with single ventricle heart disease require frequent interventions and follow‐up. Low socioeconomic status (SES) may limit access to high‐quality care and place these children at risk for poor long‐term outcomes.Methods and ResultsData from the SVR (Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial Public Use) data set were used to examine the relationship of US neighborhood SES with 30‐day and 1‐year mortality or cardiac transplantation and length of stay among neonates undergoing the Norwood procedure (n=525). Crude rates of death or transplantation at 1 year after Norwood were highest for patients living in neighborhoods with low SES (lowest tertile 37.0% versus middle tertile 31.0% versus highest tertile 23.6%, P=0.024). After adjustment for patient demographics, birth characteristics, and anatomy, patients in the highest SES tertile had significantly lower risk of death or transplant than patients in the lowest SES tertile (hazard ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.40, 0.96). When SES was examined continuously, the hazard of 1‐year death or transplant decreased steadily with increasing neighborhood SES. Hazard ratios for 30‐day transplant‐free survival and 1‐year transplant‐free survival were similar in magnitude. There were no significant differences in length of stay following the Norwood procedure by SES.ConclusionsLow neighborhood SES is associated with worse 1‐year transplant‐free survival after the Norwood procedure, suggesting that socioeconomic and environmental factors may be important determinants of outcome in critical congenital heart disease. Future studies should investigate aspects of SES and environment amenable to intervention.Clinical Trial RegistrationURL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov> http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00115934.

Truncus arteriosus survival outcomes: Does 22q 11.2 deletion matter?

“…The database design of the study allowed for an impressively large, national cohort. The ability to report on race and insurance type and outcomes is also quite interesting, and unfortunately, their findings are consistent with what has been widely observed in pediatric cardiac surgical outcomes 2‐5 . The authors should be praised for their thoughtful discussion of these findings.…”

Perception scores of siblings and parents of children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome

“…Parental education and socioeconomic status have been shown to be important predictors of overall morbidity and mortality in children with HLHS. Families and siblings affected by HLHS most likely have additional, issues that affect their day to day life that the current survey did not elicit. Future studies should evaluate sibling‐specific characteristics and other family dynamics that influence adjustment such as their own comorbidities, cognitive struggles or other health and social issues.…”

Selective Use of Inpatient Interstage Management After Norwood Procedure

“…Median income for maternal ZIP code was similar to the findings from the Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial, where census block poverty level was a risk factor for interstage mortality 7 and lower socioeconomic status had a linear correlation with 1-year transplant-free survival. 22 This measure is likely representative of generalized health disparities rather than just poverty, as socioeconomic status has been closely linked to healthcare literacy. 23 These disparities have been recognized in the wider congenital heart disease population, with higher mortality rates and more health-care utilization after congenital heart surgery in children from lower income neighborhoods, even when adjusting for race, payer, and care center.…”