2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-021-06926-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negative magnetization in the zero field-cooled and exchange-bias effect in Cu-doped PrCrO3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dM/dT data distinctly show a sharp drop below ∼5.6 K, and a clear change in the curvature of M(T) at T * in the temperature range of 22 K to 5.6 K. This weak hump in M(T) could be associated with the magnetic degree of freedom, which leads to a significant deviation in magnetic susceptibility from the Curie-Weiss behavior at low temperature (see figure 4(c)). It is interesting to note that a similar type of weak hump in magnetization data has been seen for other Pr based perovskites PrBO 3 (B = transition metals) at low temperature where the rare-earth spins order in an AFM arrangement [26][27][28][29]. The continuous increase in magnetization below T * could be associated with a minor paramagnetic (PM) impurity phase consisting of noninteracting and isolated Pr or Ir moments.…”
Section: Magnetization Studysupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dM/dT data distinctly show a sharp drop below ∼5.6 K, and a clear change in the curvature of M(T) at T * in the temperature range of 22 K to 5.6 K. This weak hump in M(T) could be associated with the magnetic degree of freedom, which leads to a significant deviation in magnetic susceptibility from the Curie-Weiss behavior at low temperature (see figure 4(c)). It is interesting to note that a similar type of weak hump in magnetization data has been seen for other Pr based perovskites PrBO 3 (B = transition metals) at low temperature where the rare-earth spins order in an AFM arrangement [26][27][28][29]. The continuous increase in magnetization below T * could be associated with a minor paramagnetic (PM) impurity phase consisting of noninteracting and isolated Pr or Ir moments.…”
Section: Magnetization Studysupporting
confidence: 54%
“…4 (c)]. It is interesting to note that a similar type of weak hump in magnetization data has been seen for other Pr based perovskites PrBO 3 (B = transition metals) at low temperature where the rare-earth spins order in an AFM arrangement [27,28,29,30]. The continuous increase in magnetization below T * could be associated with a minor paramagnetic (PM) impurity phase consisting of non-interacting and isolated Pr or Ir moments.…”
Section: Magnetization Studymentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The negative magnetization occurs in Γ 2 state within the 100 K to 223 K T-range, where the G z spin component aligns opposite to the applied field. The negative magnetization with diamagnetism-like characteristics is observed for the ZFC condition under low fields in polycrystalline HoCrO 3 and PrCr (1−x) Cu x O 3 orthochromite [43,44]. However, these reports do not show any negative susceptibility to distinguish diamagnetism.…”
Section: Magnetic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%