2012
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2012.660913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Negation: A theory of its meaning, representation, and use

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
135
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
10
135
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…for the negative is an idea; there can be no image of it' (Burke, 1966 cited in Lake andPickering, 1998:81). In accordance, Khemlani et al (2012) claim that negation cannot have a perceptual representation --hence cannot be visualized. According to all scientists mentioned here, there cannot be a certain (part of an) image inherently expressing negation (or denial).…”
Section: Can Pictures Express Assertions?mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…for the negative is an idea; there can be no image of it' (Burke, 1966 cited in Lake andPickering, 1998:81). In accordance, Khemlani et al (2012) claim that negation cannot have a perceptual representation --hence cannot be visualized. According to all scientists mentioned here, there cannot be a certain (part of an) image inherently expressing negation (or denial).…”
Section: Can Pictures Express Assertions?mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Although negation markers such as 'not' or 'no' can occupy various positions in a sentence, at the level of formal representation the place of the negator is relatively fixed and allows only for minimal variation, such as scope variation with respect to other operators like quantifiers or modal operators. 2 In the examples (1), taken from Khemlani et al (2012), (1a) exemplifies broad scope or sentential negation, whereas (1b) exemplifies narrow scope or VP-negation.…”
Section: Types Of Negation In Natural Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown by the literature on it, which is very large (just some examples of works about this theory are Johnson-Laird, 2004, 2006, 2010, 2012Johnson-Laird, Khemlani, & Goodwin, 2015a, 2015bKhemlani, Orenes, & Johnson-Laird, 2012, 2014Oakhill & Garnham, 1996;Ragni, Sonntag, & Johnson-Laird, 2016), MMT can properly explain many cognitive facts that other approaches cannot. However, Baratgin et al (2015) have raised some criticisms with regard to the way it deals with disjunction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in turn leads us to think that maybe a semantic framework such as that of the mental models theory (e.g., Johnson-Laird, 2006, 2012, 2015Johnson-Laird, Khemlani, & Goodwin, 2015;Khemlani, Lotstein, Trafton, & Johnson-Laird, 2015;Khemlani, Orenes, & Johnson-Laird, 2012, 2014 can be a better alternative to explain the real way the human mind works, irrespective of the language spoken by the particular individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%