2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11056-014-9464-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Needle-leaved trees impacts on rainfall interception and canopy storage capacity in an arid environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, two sampling strategies for measuring T f exist: stationary and roving methods. In the stationary (fixed setup) method, T f collectors are kept at fixed positions during the entire study period [23][24][25][26][27][28]. The roving collector method is a sampling strategy whereby the T f collectors are randomly relocated at regular or variable times [22,[29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, two sampling strategies for measuring T f exist: stationary and roving methods. In the stationary (fixed setup) method, T f collectors are kept at fixed positions during the entire study period [23][24][25][26][27][28]. The roving collector method is a sampling strategy whereby the T f collectors are randomly relocated at regular or variable times [22,[29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one of the key parameters in the vegetation hydrological cycle, canopy storage capacity measures the minimum amount of rainwater required to saturate the vegetation canopy (Dunkerley, 2000; Fathizadeh et al, 2018). There are many factors affecting canopy storage capacity, which can be classified into three categories: (1) meteorological factors, including rainfall amount (Kermavnar & Vilhar, 2017; Liu et al, 2018), intensity (Li et al, 2019), duration (Liu, 1997), temperature, humidity and wind interference (Attarod et al, 2015; Hörmann et al, 1996); (2) vegetation factors, including vegetation types (Xiong et al, 2018; Yan et al, 2021), morphological traits such as leaf area, dry or fresh weights of stem and leaf (Monson et al, 1992; Yan et al, 2021) and canopy characteristics, including coverage, leaf area index (Fleischbein et al, 2005; Kang et al, 2005); and (3) other factors, for instance, disturbance activities (grazing, artificially configured communities) (Lunka & Patil, 2016) and growing seasons (Deguchi et al, 2006; Herbst et al, 2008). Some studies considered the relationships between community structure and canopy storage capacity, but they tended to focus on measuring community structure with direct metrics, for example, aboveground biomass production, leaf area index (LAI), community canopy height and coverage (Deguchi et al, 2006; Holder, 2013; Yu et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to natural forests, P. tabulaeformis is also regarded as a primary species for afforestation. Some studies have used the revised Gash model to simulate canopy interception of P. tabulaeformis forests in various areas, such as the tropics [26], the Mediterranean region [27], and semi-arid and arid regions [28,29]. In this region, however, the revised Gash model has mainly been applied to simulate natural forest canopy interception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%