2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for assessment of spatial soil variation in an agricultural field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Basic methods for selecting samples out of principal component (PC) scores to recover the original variation with few samples have been tested for country and field scale (Stenberg and Nordkvist, 1996;Stenberg et al, 1995). The strategy improved the variation within sub-sets compared with random sampling for at least clay, total carbon and CEC at the country scale, and at the field scale also total N, pH, and available Mg. For a single field, Odlare et al (2005) compared variograms and kriged maps from PC scores of vis-NIR spectra with those of conventionally analyzed total C, clay, and pH. Compared with the other parameters they found the variogram of PC 1 to be the most robust, but they did not claim a specific representativity to any of the soil parameters analyzed.…”
Section: Screening and Mapping Of Overall Soil Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic methods for selecting samples out of principal component (PC) scores to recover the original variation with few samples have been tested for country and field scale (Stenberg and Nordkvist, 1996;Stenberg et al, 1995). The strategy improved the variation within sub-sets compared with random sampling for at least clay, total carbon and CEC at the country scale, and at the field scale also total N, pH, and available Mg. For a single field, Odlare et al (2005) compared variograms and kriged maps from PC scores of vis-NIR spectra with those of conventionally analyzed total C, clay, and pH. Compared with the other parameters they found the variogram of PC 1 to be the most robust, but they did not claim a specific representativity to any of the soil parameters analyzed.…”
Section: Screening and Mapping Of Overall Soil Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Predicted SOC showed nugget-sill ratios of 30.3% and 28.6%, respectively, and ranges of 1618 m and 1477 m, respectively. Nugget-sill ratios reported in the literature vary greatly depending on the local soil conditions and the sampling and analysis methods [32,61].…”
Section: Spatial Structure Analysis and Influence Of Sensor Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of soil attributes through remote sensing can assist in soil survey and mapping techniques, as well as prediction of the erosion and a more accurate fertilizing management practices (Shepard and Walsh, 2002;Odlare et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%