Navigation-Guided Reduction and Orbital Floor Reconstruction in the Treatment of Zygomatic-Orbital-Maxillary Complex Fractures

Yu, Hongbo; Shen, Guofang; Wang, Xudong; Zhang, Shilei

doi:10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.058

Cited by 104 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In oral and maxillofacial surgery, there have been clinical reports detailing the successful implementation of navigation systems for various operations (Lubbers et al, 2011a), including implant placement (Widmann et al, 2007;Xiaojun et al, 2007), trauma (Yu et al, 2010;Markiewicz et al, 2012), foreign body removal (Eggers et al, 2009a;Verhaeghe et al, 2012), tumor resection (Lubbers et al, 2011c), and orthognathic surgery (Lo et al, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: An in-vitro study

Sun

Luebbers

Agbaje

et al. 2013

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION:Perioperative navigation is a recent addition to orthognathic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of anatomical landmarks-based registration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-five holes (1.2 mm diameter) were drilled in the surface of a plastic skull model, which was then scanned using a SkyView cone beam computed tomography scanner. DICOM files were imported into BrainLab ENT 3.0.0 to make a surgical plan. Six anatomical points were selected for registration: the infraorbital foramena, the anterior nasal spine, the crown tips of the upper canines, and the mesial contact point of the upper incisors. Each registration was performed five times by two separate observers (10 times total). RESULTS: The mean target registration error (TRE) in the anterior maxillary/zygomatic region was 0.93 ± 0.31 mm (p < 0.001 compared with other anatomical regions). The only statistically significant inter-observer difference of mean TRE was at the zygomatic arch, but was not clinically relevant. CONCLUSION: With six anatomical landmarks used, the mean TRE was clinically acceptable in the maxillary/zygomatic region. This registration technique may be used to access occlusal changes during bimaxillary surgery, but should be used with caution in other anatomical regions of the skull because of the large TRE observed. Perioperative navigation is a recent addition to orthognathic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of anatomical landmark-based registration. Materials and methods: Eighty-five holes (1.2 mm diameter) were drilled in the surface of a plastic skull model, which was then scanned using a SkyView cone beam computed tomography scanner. DICOM files were imported into BrainLab ENT 3.0.0 to make a surgical plan. Six anatomical points were selected for registration: the infraorbital foramena, the anterior nasal spine, the crown tips of the upper canines, and the mesial contact point of the upper incisors. Each registration was performed five times by two separate observers (10 times total). Results: The mean target registration error (TRE) in the anterior maxillary/zygomatic region was 0.93 ± 0.31 mm (p < 0.001 compared with other anatomical regions). The only statistically significant interobserver difference of mean TRE was at the zygomatic arch, but was not clinically relevant. Conclusion: With six anatomical landmarks used, the mean TRE was clinically acceptable in the maxillary/zygomatic region. This registration technique may be used to access occlusal changes during bimaxillary surgery, but should be used with caution in other anatomical regions of the skull because of the large TRE observed.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In bimaxillary surgery, one potential source of error is poor stability of the registration template because of the interference of orthodontic hooks. Similarly, self-drilling screws were inserted into the maxillary or mandibular region under local anesthesia to serve as registration points (Yu et al, 2010).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: An in-vitro study

Sun

Luebbers

Agbaje

et al. 2013

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…is usually considered as the most accurate method for the reproduction of virtually planned zygoma osteotomy. It may be used alone to control and adjust the positioning of the zygoma by comparing its surface to the planning obtained by mirroring(Scolozzi and Schouman, 2012;Yanping et al, 2011;Yu et al, 2010). This method lacks accuracy (precision of 1.8 mm on average(Yanping et al, 2011)) and is long because accurate anatomic landmarks on thezygoma surface are lacking (He et al, 2013).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The key to accuracy of zygoma repositioning: Suitability of the SynpliciTi customized guide-plates

Schouman

Murcier

Goudot

2015

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Podemos identificar estructuras durante la disección, saber a qué distancia se encuentra el ápex orbitario o la protuberancia etmoidal (protuberancia posteromedial o «área clave») 16 . Con la «segunda» navegación confirmamos que la colocación de la malla se ajusta a la planificación 15 .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Aplicación clínica de la planificación virtual y la navegación en el tratamiento de las fracturas del suelo de la órbita

Ferrer

Heredero

Alamillos

et al. 2015

Revista Española de Cirugía Oral y Maxilofacial

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cómo citar este artículo: Dean A, et al. Aplicación clínica de la planificación virtual y la navegación en el tratamiento de las fracturas del suelo de la órbita. Rev Esp Cir Oral Maxilofac. 2015. http://dx.información del artículo Historia del artículo: Recibido el 4 de enero de 2015 Aceptado el 6 de abril de 2015 On-line el xxx Palabras clave: Fracturas de órbita Planificación quirúrgica asistida por ordenador Volumen orbitario Malla de titanio Mallas premoldeadas Cirugía virtualr e s u m e n El objetivo del tratamiento de las fracturas de órbita es reconstruir la forma tridimensional de las paredes orbitarias para restablecer el volumen orbitario y la función ocular. El enoftalmos y la diplopía producidos por la reconstrucción inapropiada de la anatomía orbitaria tras un traumatismo continúan siendo todavía una secuela de estas fracturas.El objetivo de este trabajo es describir la técnica de la planificación virtual y la navegación intraoperatoria en el tratamiento de fracturas de suelo y pared medial de la órbita como herramienta útil en el tratamiento de estas fracturas.La técnica de planificación virtual y navegación intraorbitaria se aplica para el tratamiento de pacientes con fracturas de suelo o pared medial de órbita. La corrección virtual de la órbita fracturada se realiza utilizando la imagen en espejo del lado sano superpuesta sobre el lado fracturado. La planificación preoperatoria permite, además, importar y seleccionar preoperatoriamnete una malla premoldeada y determinar la adecuación de esta, en forma y tamaño, para tratar la fractura. La navegación intraoperatoria permite la disección segura y adecuada del contenido orbitario («primera» navegación) y la confirmación de la adecuada reconstrucción de las paredes orbitarias («segunda» navegación).La planificación en ordenador, la cirugía virtual y la navegación intraoperatoria aportan una guía útil, precisa y segura para la reconstrucción orbitaria. © 2015 SECOM. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. Este es un artículo Open Access bajo la licencia CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Clinical application of virtual planning and navigation for the treatment of the orbital floor fracturesKeywords: Orbital fracturesComputer aided planning surgery Orbital volumen a b s t r a c tThe goal of the treatment of orbital fractures is to reconstruct the three-dimensional shape of the orbital walls to restore the orbital volume and eye function. Enophthalmos and diplopía caused by inappropriate orbital wall anatomy reconstruction after trauma, remain still a sequel to these fractures. * Autor para correspondencia.Correo electrónico: adeanferrer@yahoo.es (A. Dean). http://dx.

show abstract

Navigation-Guided Reduction and Orbital Floor Reconstruction in the Treatment of Zygomatic-Orbital-Maxillary Complex Fractures

Cited by 104 publications

References 23 publications

Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: An in-vitro study

Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: An in-vitro study

The key to accuracy of zygoma repositioning: Suitability of the SynpliciTi customized guide-plates

Aplicación clínica de la planificación virtual y la navegación en el tratamiento de las fracturas del suelo de la órbita

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About