2007
DOI: 10.1109/tevc.2006.883466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Natural Encoding for Evolutionary Supervised Learning

Abstract: Some of the most influential factors in the quality of the solutions found by an evolutionary algorithm (EA) are a correct coding of the search space and an appropriate evaluation function of the potential solutions. EAs are often used to learn decision rules from datasets, which are encoded as individuals in the genetic population. In this paper, the coding of the search space for the obtaining of those decision rules is approached, i.e., the representation of the individuals of the genetic population and als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance statistics of ONDPSO in terms of average percentage error, number of rules R, terms to rule ratio T/R and number of fitness evaluations FE are reported in Table 3. Table 4 shows the results where, for the seven datasets, the obtained percentage median accuracy achieved by ONDPSO has been compared with the results reported in [54]. As shown in Table 4, our proposed algorithm Figure 10 clearly shows that, most of the time during the testing phase, the algorithm stayed closer to its best performance -i.e., a low error rate.…”
Section: Performance Of Ondpso and Its Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The performance statistics of ONDPSO in terms of average percentage error, number of rules R, terms to rule ratio T/R and number of fitness evaluations FE are reported in Table 3. Table 4 shows the results where, for the seven datasets, the obtained percentage median accuracy achieved by ONDPSO has been compared with the results reported in [54]. As shown in Table 4, our proposed algorithm Figure 10 clearly shows that, most of the time during the testing phase, the algorithm stayed closer to its best performance -i.e., a low error rate.…”
Section: Performance Of Ondpso and Its Comparison With Other Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The rule base is formed by the best rules obtained when the algorithm is run multiple times. SLAVE [37], SIA [38] and HIDER [39] are examples which follow this model.…”
Section: Genetic Rule-based Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…HIDER 34 : genetic rule-based algorithm that represents knowledge in a similar fashion to GASSIST as a hierarchical set of rules which take the form of a decision list. The main difference of HIDER is that it uses natural coding 35 to represent each rule. It uses an iterative rule learning approach.…”
Section: Empirical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%