Natural and Anthropogenic Sources of Seismic, Hydroacoustic, and Infrasonic Waves: Waveforms and Spectral Characteristics (and Their Applicability for Sensor Calibration)

Abstract

The record of seismic, hydroacoustic, and infrasonic waves is essential to detect, identify, and localize sources of both natural and anthropogenic origin. To guarantee traceability and inter-station comparability, as well as an estimation of the measurement uncertainties leading to a better monitoring of natural disasters and environmental aspects, suitable measurement standards and reliable calibration procedures of sensors, especially in the low-frequency range down to 0.01 Hz, are required. Most of all with regard to the design goal of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organisation’s International Monitoring System, which requires the stations to be operational nearly 100% of the time, the on-site calibration during operation is of special importance. The purpose of this paper is to identify suitable excitation sources and elaborate necessary requirements for on-site calibrations. We give an extensive literature review of a large variety of anthropogenic and natural sources of seismic, hydroacoustic, and infrasonic waves, describe their most prominent features regarding signal and spectral characteristics, explicitly highlight some source examples, and evaluate the reviewed sources with respect to requirements for on-site calibrations such as frequency bandwidth, signal properties as well as the applicability in terms of cost–benefit. According to our assessment, earthquakes stand out across all three waveform technologies as a good natural excitation signal meeting the majority of the requirements. Furthermore, microseisms and microbaroms allow a calibration at very low frequencies. We also find that in each waveform technique man-made controlled sources such as drop weights or air guns are in good agreement with the required properties, although limitations may arise regarding the practicability. Using these sources, procedures will be established allowing calibration without record interrupting, thereby improving data quality and the identification of treaty-related events.

Distributed acoustic sensing of ocean-bottom seismo-acoustics and distant storms: A case study from Svalbard, Norway

“…Seismo-acoustic waves propagating through the seawater and the solid earth cause strain fluctuation in an ocean-bottom fiber-optic cable upon their arrivals. Seismoacoustic waves are emitted by a great variety of sources from both natural and anthropogenic origins, as discussed in Schwardt et al (2022). At some specific frequencies equal or close to the natural frequencies (also known as eigenfrequencies) of the system, the seismo-acoustic waves can excite modes of vibration in the media where they are propagating, which are called standing waves or normal modes.…”

A calculable pistonphone for the absolute calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range from 0.5 Hz to 250 Hz

“…These include acoustic surveying for oil and gas exploration, monitoring of tsunamis using ocean bottom sensing networks, naval defence applications, and monitoring for nuclear testing by the international monitoring system of the comprehensive test ban treaty [1,2]. Low frequency measurements are required for the study of sounds made by natural sources such as ice calving, baleen whales and earthquakes [3][4][5]. Noise pollution from anthropogenic sources is increasingly recognised as an environmental concern and is now the subject of regulation [6,7] with the sources of greatest concern being at low frequencies where the propagation of sound leads to large environmental footprints and where sources are sometimes of high acoustic energy.…”

Seismic Beacon—A New Instrument for Detection of Changes in Rock Massif

“…Various artificial seismic sources were developed during the last decades [ 11 ]. Besides chemical explosions, the most common devices are truck-mounted vibrators that are capable of generating vibrations with changing frequencies, so-called sweeps.…”