2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Native lysozyme and dry-heated lysozyme interactions with membrane lipid monolayers: Lateral reorganization of LPS monolayer, model of the Escherichia coli outer membrane

Abstract: Lysozyme is mainly described active against Gram-positive bacteria, but is also efficient against some Gram-negative species. Especially, it was recently demonstrated that lysozyme disrupts Escherichia coli membranes. Moreover, dry-heating changes the physicochemical properties of the protein and increases the membrane activity of lysozyme. In order to elucidate the mode of insertion of lysozyme into the bacterial membrane, the interaction between lysozyme and a LPS monolayer mimicking the E. coli outer membra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negatively charged molecule lipopolysaccharide in the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria can attract cationic antimicrobial proteins [ 64 ]. In fact, the presence of lipopolysaccharide in in vitro–generated lipid monolayers is sufficient to promote the insertion of lysozyme [ 65 ]. However, while reducing the negative charge of lipopolysaccharide generally increases the resistance of gram-negative bacteria to cationic antimicrobial proteins [ 64 ], the degree to which this affects gram-negative resistance to lysozyme is largely unknown.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Bacterial Lysozyme Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negatively charged molecule lipopolysaccharide in the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria can attract cationic antimicrobial proteins [ 64 ]. In fact, the presence of lipopolysaccharide in in vitro–generated lipid monolayers is sufficient to promote the insertion of lysozyme [ 65 ]. However, while reducing the negative charge of lipopolysaccharide generally increases the resistance of gram-negative bacteria to cationic antimicrobial proteins [ 64 ], the degree to which this affects gram-negative resistance to lysozyme is largely unknown.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Bacterial Lysozyme Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explanation is also assumed for the interface-active apolipoproteins A-I and A-II at the lipid-water interface. The average residue hydrophobicity and the probable helical structure of these types of proteins may be the key factor for this binding affinity with the phospholipid monolayer at the air-water interface [23,24]. Also, the same interaction procedure has been discussed by Donald and Patterson [25] when studying the adsorption and insertion of β-lactoglobulin from solution into the lipid monolayer at the airwater interface.…”
Section: Lipid Solution and Monolayer Preparation 23 Lipoprotein Solmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Gram-positive bacteria have a thick cell wall composed of up to 40 layers of peptidoglycan, which is very sensitive to lysozyme [ 26 ], while Gram-negative bacteria typically have only a single layer of peptidoglycan surrounded by an asymmetric membrane bilayer, which is thought to render Gram-negative bacteria naturally impermeable to lysozyme, and thus resistant to its effects [ 26 ]. However, recent evidence indicates that lysozyme can interact with the negatively charged membrane lipid bilayers leading to protein aggregation and membrane fusion [ 27 ], and can permeabilize the outer and inner membranes of an E. coli mutant ML-35p by inducing the formation of large pores [ 6 , 28 ]. This suggests that the physical barrier afforded by the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria might not be the main reason responsible for their greater resistance to lysozyme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%