Nasal correction in maxillonasal dysplasia (Binder's syndrome): a long term follow-up study

Draf, Wolfgang; Bockmühl, Ulrike; Hoffmann, Bernard

doi:10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00099-7

Cited by 32 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Since this condition was first described in 1962, more than 200 cases have been reported, but mainly by plastic and reconstructive surgeons [5][6][7][8][9][10]. Quarrell et al [11] in 1990 reviewed the literature and concluded that the disorder does not represent a single nosologic entity and that the use of the word 'syndrome' or 'dysplasia' is inappropriate.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillo-Nasal Dysplasia (Binder Syndrome): Antenatal Discovery and Implications

Cuillier¹,

Cartault

Lemaire³

et al. 2005

Fetal Diagn Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Binder syndrome (BS) or maxillo-nasal dysplasia is an uncommon developmental anomaly affecting primarily the anterior part of the maxilla and nasal complex. The characteristic findings are a failure of development in the premaxillary area with associated deformities of the nasal skeleton and the overlying soft tissues. Affected individuals typically have an unusually flat, underdeveloped midface (midfacial hypoplasia), with an abnormally short nose and flat nasal bridge, underdeveloped upper jaw, relatively protruding lower jaw and/or a ‘reverse overbite’ (or class III malocclusion). A case of BS was diagnosed at 24 weeks of gestation using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound. The first sign was an isolated flattened fetal nose in the mid-sagittal plane. Further ultrasound imaging showed the absence of the naso-frontal angle, giving impression of flat forehead and small fetal nose. We discuss about this entity.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Maxillo-Nasal Dysplasia (Binder Syndrome): Antenatal Discovery and Implications

Cuillier¹,

Cartault

Lemaire³

et al. 2005

Fetal Diagn Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…156 Others advocate rib cartilage grafting and columellar struts in an L-shaped construct for nasal bridge reconstruction. 157 Columellar lengthening can be achieved with a V-Y advancement flap and provide adequate space for columellar and nasal tip grafting. The nasal soft tissue is usually not an issue, and local flaps do not need to be incorporated.…”

Section: Binder Syndromementioning

confidence: 99%

Craniofacial Syndromes

Buchanan

Xue

Hollier

2014

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

167

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Craniofacial syndromes fall into two major categories-those associated with craniosynostosis, and those associated with clefts. Each has a different set of potential complications requiring a unique approach for surgical management. Craniosynostosis is a congenital disorder in which one or more of the cranial sutures fuses prematurely. The most common syndromes associated with this condition include Crouzon, Apert, Pfeiffer, Muenke, and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes. Surgical management of these children requires a multidisciplinary approach and close involvement of the family. Operations must take into consideration the growing potential of the bony structures. Common syndromes associated with clefts include Pierre Robin, Treacher Collins, Nager, Binder, and Stickler syndromes. Many of these children have severe airway issues requiring immediate address before operative reconstruction. As with syndromes associated with craniosynostosis, the key to management is a multidisciplinary approach focused on the right timing. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical presentation, care, and treatment of these patients.

show abstract

“…Therefore, some suggest early correction. 16 Monasterio et al 17 suggested that early surgery with repeated augmentation every few years may help to progressively expand the soft tissue envelope covering the nose and the lining of the nasal cavities, duplicating a pattern similar to normal growth. Goh and Chen 15 proposed that, should the deformity cause psychological distress before patients reach appropriate age for surgery, silicon implantation can act as an effective temporary method of nasal lengthening and stretching of the soft tissue covering while also preserving the availability of autologous donor sites for future use.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%