2017
DOI: 10.1109/jiot.2017.2764475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrowband Internet of Things: Implementations and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
110
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the existing works [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] propose effective methods to estimate the cost of a given workload over candidate physical configurations. However, only a few of them consider the situations where data can be replicated [20,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the existing works [17][18][19][20][21][22][23] propose effective methods to estimate the cost of a given workload over candidate physical configurations. However, only a few of them consider the situations where data can be replicated [20,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the IoT devices normally have very limited computation and storage capabilities, MEC enables the latency-sensitive IoT applications to offload the huge amount of sensed data to the MEC servers, which are deployed near the base stations (BSs) and offer large storage and computation facilities [1]- [4]. To upload the sensed data from the IoT devices to the MEC server, NB-IoT cellular transmission technology is an attractive option, which is recently introduced in Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) Release 13, and is a longterm evolution (LTE) variant designed specifically for IoT [5], [6]. It enables mobile operators to efficiently support a massive number of IoT devices with low data rate transmissions and improved coverage using a small portion of their existing available licensed spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There exist several typical coordination methods, such as time division multiple access (TDMA), 16 frequency division multiple access (FDMA), 17 orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), 18 and non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), 19 etc. There exist several typical coordination methods, such as time division multiple access (TDMA), 16 frequency division multiple access (FDMA), 17 orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), 18 and non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), 19 etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To transmit data, IoT devices need to coordinate the access to radio channels. There exist several typical coordination methods, such as time division multiple access (TDMA), 16 frequency division multiple access (FDMA), 17 orthogonal frequency division multiple access (OFDMA), 18 and non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA), 19 etc. Particularly, considering that NOMA applies the successive interference cancelation (SIC) technology and controls proper transmission power, 20 we consider employing the NOMA technique to coordinate IoT devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%