2000
DOI: 10.1086/449001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanook and His Contemporaries: Imagining Eskimos in American Culture, 1897-1922

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Made before the coming of sound in cinema, Flaherty’s unusually intimate portrayal of an Inuit man, ‘Nanook’ (played by Allakariallak, a long‐term collaborator of the filmmaker), comprised extended observational scenes and textual interventions in the form of intertitles. According to some commentators (Huhndorf ), Flaherty’s depiction of Nanook ’s central character is narrow and stereotypical. For these critics, the filmmaker presents his subject as simple, childlike and primitive and, as such, consistent with an established history of western images of the Eskimo.…”
Section: Ethnographic Film and Individual Livesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Made before the coming of sound in cinema, Flaherty’s unusually intimate portrayal of an Inuit man, ‘Nanook’ (played by Allakariallak, a long‐term collaborator of the filmmaker), comprised extended observational scenes and textual interventions in the form of intertitles. According to some commentators (Huhndorf ), Flaherty’s depiction of Nanook ’s central character is narrow and stereotypical. For these critics, the filmmaker presents his subject as simple, childlike and primitive and, as such, consistent with an established history of western images of the Eskimo.…”
Section: Ethnographic Film and Individual Livesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O sorriso de Nanook foi objeto de pelo menos duas interpretações propostas por Huhndorf (2000) e Raheja (2007). A argumentação central de Raheja é uma crítica geral à política representacional imagética sobre os índios norte-americanos, tomando o sorriso de Nanook como um claro excesso de ocidentalismo/ eurocentrismo de Flaherty.…”
Section: O Sorriso O Rir E a Imagem Relacionalunclassified
“…Parental worry about the possibly detrimental effects of a modern pastime is here coupled with a specific reference to the Inuit context: becoming "a flat image on the wall" echoes the colonial history of image-production in the Arctic, where Indigenous people were reduced to stereotypes of an exotic wilderness, a medial practice that Shari Huhndorf traces to Robert Flaherty's Nanook of the North (1922). 28 In engaging with film, the mother seems to say, her daughter risks surrendering herself as the object of Southern projections. However, the eye of the opening scene already puts this comment into perspective: it is the protagonist's -and, by extension, the filmmakers'eyes that are doing the looking here and the gaze that she exercises on herself is more complex than simply one of subjugation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Nanook of the North could be seen as an unintentional portrayal of Allakariallak's amusement at the expectations of Southern audiences, Restless River determinedly turns the camera around and places the American colonial presence as the object of the gaze. 29 In this self-reflexive move where the filmmakers place their work alongside earlier images of the Arctic, river water is employed as a metaphor of mediation. Immediately before the scene with the imagined cinema on the ceiling, a sequence interweaves the movements of river water, wind, and cinematic images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%