2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano-delivery system targeting to cancer stem cell cluster of differentiation biomarkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 262 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, surface functionalization of PS can be extensively modified and tailored using the high flexibility and customizability of BCP [2325]. For example, the surface conjugation of various ligands can enable PS to function as targeted drug carriers that enhance the selective recognition of specific cells or tissues, thus optimizing their pharmacokinetics and biodistribution [26, 27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, surface functionalization of PS can be extensively modified and tailored using the high flexibility and customizability of BCP [2325]. For example, the surface conjugation of various ligands can enable PS to function as targeted drug carriers that enhance the selective recognition of specific cells or tissues, thus optimizing their pharmacokinetics and biodistribution [26, 27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Although the EPR-based passive targeting has been a pillar for the evolution of macromolecular anticancer therapy, it is applicable only for macromolecules larger than 40 kD [17] and, thereby, there is a need for alternative approaches for smaller drugs to gain long circulation, active targeting, and more efficient drug delivery. [24,25] To straighten out these drawbacks, the application of cell membrane coated nanoparticles (NPs) is a novel strategy for drug delivery in which NPs are coated and/or camouflaged with cell membranes for the effective delivery of therapeutic agents. Hence, most of the newly developed modalities are largely focus on active targeting to achieve more efficient delivery of drugs, genes, and theranostics to the sites of interest as well as elevated quantity of drug accumulation in the target cell(s).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is possible to differentiate CSCs from other common cancer cells and normal stem cells on the strength of their specific surface biomarkers 65 . There have been quite a lot of biomarkers described, such as CD44, CD133, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) 66 . The strong binding between the existing biomarkers and their specific antibodies provides enhanced targeting based on the EPR effect, which is accompanied by a high cellular uptake and increased drug concentration in CSCs 13 , 38 , 67 .…”
Section: Ddss For Direct Targeting Of Cscs At the Cellular Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%