1994
DOI: 10.17487/rfc1617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Naming and Structuring Guidelines for X.500 Directory Pilots

Abstract: Status of this Memo This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The root of a name server DIT is an entry of objectclass organization as specified by RFC 1617 [2]. It has no significance other than to serve as the root of the DIT.…”
Section: Access Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The root of a name server DIT is an entry of objectclass organization as specified by RFC 1617 [2]. It has no significance other than to serve as the root of the DIT.…”
Section: Access Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The currently preferable way for publishing the information is by using X.500 as its data structure and naming scheme (defined in [4] and discussed in [3], but some countries use a refinement nationally, like [15] for the US). The organization MAY additionally publish it using additional data structures such as whois++.…”
Section: Summary and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual's name -The individual's e-mail address, in RFC-822 format; if not present, some other contact information is to be included -Some indication of the individual's relationship with the maintainer When X.500 is used as directory services protocol the last requirement may be fulfilled by using the "organizationalStatus" attribute (see [3]) or by adding a special organizational unit to the local X.500 name space that reflects the relation (like ou=students or ou=employees).…”
Section: What Kind Of Information Should Be Published?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations