2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00592-019-01378-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myopathy with DPP-4 inhibitors and statins in the real world: investigating the likelihood of drug–drug interactions through the FDA adverse event reporting system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the aim of our study is to detect the possible occurrence of MAEs in patients exposed to PCSK9 inhibitors alone and further, compare the reports of PCSK9 inhibitors together with statins with the condition where they are prescribed alone; the target population is categorized into three groups [ 20 ]: reports of patients prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors and without statins; reports of patients prescribed statins and without PCSK9 inhibitors; reports of patients simultaneously prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors and statins. The reference group is composed of reports exposed to neither PCSK9 inhibitors nor statins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the aim of our study is to detect the possible occurrence of MAEs in patients exposed to PCSK9 inhibitors alone and further, compare the reports of PCSK9 inhibitors together with statins with the condition where they are prescribed alone; the target population is categorized into three groups [ 20 ]: reports of patients prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors and without statins; reports of patients prescribed statins and without PCSK9 inhibitors; reports of patients simultaneously prescribed PCSK9 inhibitors and statins. The reference group is composed of reports exposed to neither PCSK9 inhibitors nor statins.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, we downloaded the data from the FAERS website from October 2015 to June 2021. The following reasons explain why the FAERS attracts our attention: collection of millions of spontaneous adverse events reports; public and easy access to raw data obtained in a format suitable for external researchers or consumers to look to signal detection of adverse drug events; published previous studies demonstrating great accuracy in detecting safety signals, especially for DDIs, and monitoring uncommon adverse events [20][21][22].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database collects voluntary AE reports of post-marketed drugs submitted by manufacturers, healthcare professionals, and consumers from United States and non-US countries. Compared to other international databases for spontaneous AE reporting, FAERS has several distinctive characteristics, including the heterogeneous catchment area (to broaden the generalization of findings), the public access to raw data that can be downloaded in a format suitable for customized analysis ( Antonazzo et al, 2020 ). Data mining from the FAERS pharmacovigilance source can be utilized to evaluate drug safety, such as identifying rare or new AEs ( Meng et al, 2021 ) and quantitatively detecting drug-drug interactions (DDIs) ( Oshima et al, 2018 ; Antonazzo et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent past, analysis of the spontaneous reporting systems (SRSs) has attracted considerable interest among clinicians for the accurate and timely characterization of drug-and vaccine-related risks occurring in the real world, where comorbidities and polypharmacotherapy exist. By offering a global epidemiological perspective, these pharmacovigilance studies have been pursued to test the hypothesis of potential associations, including refusing the likelihood of interactions [3,16,17], especially for rare, unexpected, and delayed AEs, such as MP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%