2015
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Myeloid cell-derived inducible nitric oxide synthase suppresses M1 macrophage polarization

Abstract: Here we show that iNOS-deficient mice display enhanced classically activated M1 macrophage polarization without major effects on alternatively activated M2 macrophages. eNOS and nNOS mutant mice show comparable M1 macrophage polarization compared with wild-type control mice. Addition of N6-(1-iminoethyl)-L-lysine dihydrochloride, an iNOS inhibitor, significantly enhances M1 macrophage polarization while S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine, a NO donor, suppresses M1 macrophage polarization. NO derived from iNOS med… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
110
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
9
110
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This was somewhat unexpected and could be explained by the fact that we found an increase of both C/EBPβ (M2 transcriptional regulator) and HIf1α (M1 transcriptional regulator) after polarization with LPS or INFγ in isolated KCs from miR-155 KO mice. A recent study revealed that iNOS deficient mice had enhanced M1 macrophage differentiation after polarization but without having major effects on M2 macrophages [35]. Our results support the notion that macrophages likely exist as a mixed population of M1/M2 in vivo or as hybrid phenotypes instead of an entirely polarized M1 or M2 phenotype [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was somewhat unexpected and could be explained by the fact that we found an increase of both C/EBPβ (M2 transcriptional regulator) and HIf1α (M1 transcriptional regulator) after polarization with LPS or INFγ in isolated KCs from miR-155 KO mice. A recent study revealed that iNOS deficient mice had enhanced M1 macrophage differentiation after polarization but without having major effects on M2 macrophages [35]. Our results support the notion that macrophages likely exist as a mixed population of M1/M2 in vivo or as hybrid phenotypes instead of an entirely polarized M1 or M2 phenotype [35].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A recent study revealed that iNOS deficient mice had enhanced M1 macrophage differentiation after polarization but without having major effects on M2 macrophages [35]. Our results support the notion that macrophages likely exist as a mixed population of M1/M2 in vivo or as hybrid phenotypes instead of an entirely polarized M1 or M2 phenotype [35]. …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…We intend to build a simple and abstract mathematical model to illustrate the role of IRAK-M in preventing leaky low-grade inflammation, based on experimental evidence from this study as well as previous studies6566. We posit that sustained and low levels of JNK activities potentiate MCP-1 expression and non-resolving low-degree inflammation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Recent studies from our group and other suggest another intriguing aspect of innate immunity programming and memory, in that innate leukocytes may not only be able to recognize different combinations of extra-cellular stimulants, but also discern their relative signal strength (Baker et al, 2014;Deng et al, 2013;Lu et al, 2015;Maitra et al, 2012;Maitra et al, 2011;Morris et al, 2014). This is reflected in the cardinal example of endotoxin priming and tolerance.…”
Section: Signal Strength-dependent Programming Of Innate Leukocytesmentioning
confidence: 89%