1995
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.131.9.1052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycosis fungoides palmaris et plantaris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though only a fraction of MF patients (4 out of 722) presented with skin lesions that were restricted to or primarily affected the palms and soles, growing awareness will likely help to identify patients with this rare variant otherwise diagnosed or classified as chronic palmoplantar eczema resistant to standard therapy. This assumption is supported by increasing numbers of case reports since the introduction of the term by Resnik et al [2]in 1995 [14, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. We report 3 additional patients with MF-type CTCL of the hands and soles, based on indicative and diagnostic histopathology (fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Though only a fraction of MF patients (4 out of 722) presented with skin lesions that were restricted to or primarily affected the palms and soles, growing awareness will likely help to identify patients with this rare variant otherwise diagnosed or classified as chronic palmoplantar eczema resistant to standard therapy. This assumption is supported by increasing numbers of case reports since the introduction of the term by Resnik et al [2]in 1995 [14, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. We report 3 additional patients with MF-type CTCL of the hands and soles, based on indicative and diagnostic histopathology (fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…In line with this proposed unifying concept, the entity of MF palmaris et plantaris was introduced recently as a distinct variant that groups patients with skin lesions confined to the palms and soles based on clinical and histopathologic MF-like characteristics [2]. Reevaluating the literature, Resnik et al [2]found 12 more patients in addition to their own four cases who were eligible for this diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another controversial aspect of PR is its relationship to MF (5,16,18,(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32). Much of the controversy arises from the clinical and microscopic similarities between the two entities, the lack of established diagnostic criteria for PR, and, as a result, different interpretations by different authors.…”
Section: Cd2mentioning
confidence: 99%