“…Obviously, the electrocatalytic properties of TS (24) -P (50) -V 2 C are much better than those of TS (18) -P (50) -V 2 C, TS (30) -P (50) -V 2 C, P (50) -V 2 C, V 2 C-MXene, and Ni-foam (Figure a); the improved OER activity of TS (24) -P (50) -V 2 C may be ascribed to the microscopic pores and lattice tensile strain induced by the heterostructure, which could offer rich accessible active sites . TS (24) -P (50) -V 2 C demonstrates an enhanced OER behavior compared with related reports such as those for NFPS@MXene (282 mV), NiFe 2 O 4 /Ti 3 C 2 (266 mV), NiCoS/Ti 3 C 2 T x (365 mV), Ru-SA/Ti 3 C 2 T x (290 mV), and MWCNT-MXene (290 mV) (Figure S6). Moreover, TS (24) -P (50) -V 2 C still delivers the best OER performance at the current densities of 20 and 100 mA/cm 2 (η20 = 321 mV, η100 = 531 mV), lower than those of TS (18) -P (50) -V 2 C (η20 = 351 mV, η100 = 581 mV), TS (30) -P (50) -V 2 C (η20 = 372 mV, η100 = 671 mV), P (50) -V 2 C (η20 = 551 mV, η100 = 731 mV), and V 2 C-MXene (η20 = 571 mV, η100 = 741 mV).…”