2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.vph.2006.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Murine models of myocardial and limb ischemia: Diagnostic end-points and relevance to clinical problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only in experimental animal angiography studies, but not in their clinical counterparts, is an angiographic classification for assessing peripheral collaterals currently used (0=no filling of collaterals, 1=fill-ing of collaterals only, 2=partial filling of distal femoral artery, and 3=complete filling of distal femoral artery). 17 Alternatively, a transverse line marking the inferior border of the obliteration can be drawn, and all vessels that cross the line at the inferior border can be counted as collaterals. 7 Although this method has been used successfully in a clinical study identifying risk factors for poor collateral development in PAD, 7 its use may lead to a rather arbitrary classification of collaterals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only in experimental animal angiography studies, but not in their clinical counterparts, is an angiographic classification for assessing peripheral collaterals currently used (0=no filling of collaterals, 1=fill-ing of collaterals only, 2=partial filling of distal femoral artery, and 3=complete filling of distal femoral artery). 17 Alternatively, a transverse line marking the inferior border of the obliteration can be drawn, and all vessels that cross the line at the inferior border can be counted as collaterals. 7 Although this method has been used successfully in a clinical study identifying risk factors for poor collateral development in PAD, 7 its use may lead to a rather arbitrary classification of collaterals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we noted increased number of necrotic toes of Nrf2 + / + mice ( p = 0.075 vs. Nrf2 -/ -) (Fig. 7C), the evaluation of which provides an additional method of estimating the rate of recovery after ischemia (38). However, we did not observe any significant differences in the number of blood vessels (capillaries and small arteries) in the ischemic muscles of Nrf2 + / + and Nrf2 -/ -mice at day 21 after FAL (not shown).…”
Section: Lack Of Nrf2 Modulates Revascularization After Falmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This method measures reduced ischemia-induced angiogenesis in the smaller vessels of the gastrocnemius that are sufficiently deep into the limb so as not to be detected by LDI. 38 Thus, both large and small arterial vessel angiogenesis is impaired in PRCP-deficient mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%