2016
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Murine Model Imitating Chronic Wound Infections for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Efficacy

Abstract: It is generally acknowledged that the age of antibiotics could come to an end, due to their widespread, and inappropriate use. Particularly for chronic wounds alternatives are being thought. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (APDT) is a potential candidate, and while approved for some indications, such as periodontitis, chronic sinusitis and other niche indications, its use in chronic wounds is not established. To further facilitate the development of APDT in chronic wounds we present an easy to use animal mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To elevate aBL as an advantageous approach over conventional antibiotics, the anti‐biofilm and anti‐pathogenic efficacy of aBL must be determined using an in vivo infection model. Many in vivo models of bacterial infection exist, including Arabidopsis thaliana , Drosophila melanogaster mice and rat models . One promising organism is C. elegans .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To elevate aBL as an advantageous approach over conventional antibiotics, the anti‐biofilm and anti‐pathogenic efficacy of aBL must be determined using an in vivo infection model. Many in vivo models of bacterial infection exist, including Arabidopsis thaliana , Drosophila melanogaster mice and rat models . One promising organism is C. elegans .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this requires the mandatory use of genetically modified LIGHT−/− mice. Another study has defined as chronic a wound that did not heal following an infection associated with the application of Tegaderm . Nevertheless, the measurements made during this study never exceeded 8 days after inoculation, a time period that we consider too short for a chronic wound model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Further this decreased the number of mice needed for infection studies as it eliminated the need to sacrifice mice at specific time points for bacterial burdens. The use of bioluminescent bacteria to track wound infections has been growing in popularity and become a more common practice (Guo et al, 2013;Fila et al, 2016;Agostinho Hunt et al, 2017). Many wound infection studies, however, lack the use of silicon splints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%