1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-128x(199709/10)11:5<379::aid-cem482>3.3.co;2-#
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Multivariate modelling of the pharmaceutical two-step process of wet granulation and tableting with multiblock partial least squares

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
8
4
2
0

Citation Types

0
16
0
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
11
2

Relationship

0
13

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 12 publications

(16 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

0
16
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the CPCA-W algorithm (Westerhuis, Kourti, Macgregor 1998) was used to generate the MB-PCA model. MB-PLS with super-score deflation (Westerhuis, Coenegracht 1997) was used to generate the MB-PLS model. Both blocks were scaled to unit variance prior to modeling, and equal contribution of each block to the models (fairness) was ensured by further scaling each block by the square root of its variable count (Smilde, Westerhuis, de Jong 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…More specifically, the CPCA-W algorithm (Westerhuis, Kourti, Macgregor 1998) was used to generate the MB-PCA model. MB-PLS with super-score deflation (Westerhuis, Coenegracht 1997) was used to generate the MB-PLS model. Both blocks were scaled to unit variance prior to modeling, and equal contribution of each block to the models (fairness) was ensured by further scaling each block by the square root of its variable count (Smilde, Westerhuis, de Jong 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…In other words, the focus in GCA-RT is not on recovering the total variance of the dataset to be explained as it is the case in mbRA. In addition, the first-order solution of GCA-RT is given by u (1) , the eigenvector of the matrix P Y P k P X k À Á , or alternatively by t (1) , the eigenvector of the matrix ( P k P X k P Y ), associated with the largest eigenvalue. Because GCA-RT involves the inversion of matrices (X 0 k X k ) and (Y 0 Y), it is sensitive to the multicollinearity in either X k or Y.…”
Section: Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. The solution is given by v (1) , the eigenvector of (Y 0 XX 0 Y), or alternatively by w (1) the eigenvector of the matrix (X 0 YY 0 X), associated with the largest eigenvalue [2,18]. It follows that mbPLS is neither sensitive to multicollinearity in X k nor in Y, and leads then to a more stable solution.…”
Section: Alternative Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The farms which have a risk profile for the disease are those for which the rates of seropositive sows and piglets are low (few antibody transmission from the sow to the piglets) and the rate of fattening pigs is high (high infection pressure). It turns out that the risk factors are associated with negative values on both global components t (1) and t (2) whereas protective factors are associated with positive values. In comparison with the block importance results, this graphical display also highlights that the explanatory variables from X 2 and X 4 have on the whole weak contributions to the first two global component inertia.…”
Section: Model (Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.
“…As the explanatory variables have been standardized, the total variance in each block is equal to the number of variables in this block. This motivates the block scaling in order to put the blocks on the same footing [30]. For this purpose, each of the ( K =4) explanatory block is accommodated with a scaling factor to set them at the same total variance 1/ K .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
Exaggerated anticipatory anxiety is common in social anxiety disorder (SAD). Neuroimaging studies have revealed altered neural activity in response to social stimuli in SAD, but fewer studies have examined neural activity during anticipation of feared social stimuli in SAD. The current study examined the time course and magnitude of activity in threat processing brain regions during speech anticipation in socially anxious individuals and healthy controls (HC). Method Participants (SAD n = 58; HC n = 16) underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during which they completed a 90s control anticipation task and 90s speech anticipation task.