Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques - SIGGRAPH '99 1999
DOI: 10.1145/311535.311586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiresolution mesh morphing

Abstract: We present a new method for user controlled morphing of two homeomorphic triangle meshes of arbitrary topology. In particular we focus on the problem of establishing a correspondence map between source and target meshes. Our method employs the MAPS algorithm to parameterize both meshes over simple base domains and an additional harmonic map bringing the latter into correspondence. To control the mapping the user specifies any number of feature pairs, which control the parameterizations produced by the MAPS alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
121
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
121
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphing and Detail Transfer A map between the surfaces of two objects allows the transfer of detail from one object to another [81,99,121], or the interpolation between the shape and appearance of several objects [2,63,66,71,109]. By varying the interpolation ratios over time, one can produce morphing animations.…”
Section: 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Morphing and Detail Transfer A map between the surfaces of two objects allows the transfer of detail from one object to another [81,99,121], or the interpolation between the shape and appearance of several objects [2,63,66,71,109]. By varying the interpolation ratios over time, one can produce morphing animations.…”
Section: 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By varying the interpolation ratios over time, one can produce morphing animations. In spatially varying and frequency-varying morphs, the rate of change can be different for different parts of the objects, or different frequency bands (coarseness of the features being transformed) [63,66,71]. Such a map can either be computed directly or, as more commonly done, computed by mapping both object surfaces to a common domain (Sections 5 and 6).…”
Section: 1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mesh parameterization methods that can achieve mappings to satisfy the constraint on semantic feature correspondences will be useful for several DGP applications [10]. A more general approach is to parameterize the meshes onto a common base mesh [11]- [14]. These techniques accelerate the convenience of the parameterization between meshes since the use of a common base mesh is suitable for creating a map from one mesh to another with semantic feature correspondences.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross parameterizations determine a bijective mapping between a source mesh and a target mesh. Many of the existing approaches [30,21,3,22] require that the source and target be of the same genus. The methods of [30,21] find compatible base triangulations on the input models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%