2001
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2001)127:2(89)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multireservoir Modeling with Dynamic Programming and Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where   Chaotic optimization algorithm (COA), which utilizes the nature of chaos sequence including the quasi-stochastic property and ergodicity, is a popular optimization method [6] CPSO is introduction of chaos optimization ideas into particle swarm optimization algorithm; the main purpose is to find the dynamic perturbation of the particles by introducing the norepetitive ergodicity of the chaos into the solution space. By introducing processing, can make the particles in the solution space in the random and regular "flight", jump out from local space to find a better solution, improve the speed and precision of the particle optimization process.…”
Section: Cpsomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Where   Chaotic optimization algorithm (COA), which utilizes the nature of chaos sequence including the quasi-stochastic property and ergodicity, is a popular optimization method [6] CPSO is introduction of chaos optimization ideas into particle swarm optimization algorithm; the main purpose is to find the dynamic perturbation of the particles by introducing the norepetitive ergodicity of the chaos into the solution space. By introducing processing, can make the particles in the solution space in the random and regular "flight", jump out from local space to find a better solution, improve the speed and precision of the particle optimization process.…”
Section: Cpsomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithms are usually classified into three general categories: traditional optimizers, modern metaheuristics, and hybrid approaches. Various optimization models based on linear programming (LP), no-linear programming (NLP), dynamic programming (DP), genetic algorithms (GA), artificial neural Network (ANN) and differential evolution (DE) have been developed for solving the cascade reservoir hydroelectric system scheduling problem in recent years [5,6]. However, the existed drawbacks included premature phenomena and trapping in the local optimum lead to these methods no longer suitable for complex cascaded hydro system [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The annual sediment runoff a preferable simulation effect for the daily and monthly runoff time series. The ANN is also adopted to derive operating policies of a reservoir, such as [15][16][17][18]. Neelakantan and Pundarikanthan [19] presented a planning model for reservoir operation using a combined backpropagation neural network simulation-optimization (Hooke and Jeeves nonlinear optimization method) process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among those, dynamic programming (DP) has long been recognized as powerful tool and global optimizer, however it targets only continuous optimal control problems in the field of operational optimization of waterwork systems [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]35]. In the context of dynamic programming discrete pump models are rarely used, the literature lacks the application of DP on combinatorial problems introduced by on/off type pumps or/and valves implemented in a water distribution system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%