1994
DOI: 10.1101/gr.3.4.s65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiplex PCR: advantages, development, and applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
206
0
7

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 341 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
206
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common problem is that quite a number of primers have to be used in the same reaction tube or well and these molecules may interact with each other, which may block the reaction [7,9,10,14,22]. A further problem may be the reliable identification of the various PCR products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common problem is that quite a number of primers have to be used in the same reaction tube or well and these molecules may interact with each other, which may block the reaction [7,9,10,14,22]. A further problem may be the reliable identification of the various PCR products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, multiplex PCR is able to detect multiple target DNA sequences in a single reaction, with the simultaneous identification of two or more kinds of pathogens, simplifying the workflow and processing time, which are significantly reduced (Bilgic et al 2013), among other advantages (Edwards and Gibbs 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the development of a multiplex qPCR using the same gene is difficult due to the competition for resources. Moreover, when one target is more abundant than another, unequal amplification will occur and the differences will be enhanced during each cycle, leading to artifact and misinterpretation of the data (Edwards and Gibbs, 1994). Furthermore, the use of the 16S rDNA gene, even though it is a highly homologous target sequence for practically all bacteria which can be used for detection (Barken et al, 2007;Mothershed and Whitney, 2006), can deliver some technical problems.…”
Section: Comparison Between Taqman Sybr Green and Microscopymentioning
confidence: 99%