Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004905.pub2
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
142
22
19
4

Citation Types

2
98
3
7

Year Published

Range
2003
2003
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
147
21
13
2

Relationship

12
171

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 183 publications

(110 citation statements)
references

References 82 publications

2
98
3
7
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These findings are comparable to the results of the systematic review of UNIMAPP trials [37] (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82 – 0.99) based on 12 studies, which are also included in our analysis. These findings are however, different from our previous Cochrane review which was based on a limited set of studies [14] and reported a non-significant effect on SGA (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93 – 1.17). Our current data are also at variance with a recent meta-analysis by Shah et al [38] which analyzed results from only 5 RCTs and reported a statistically insignificant impact on SGA (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77 – 1.01).…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These findings corroborates those from earlier reviews [14,36] which also revealed no significant benefit of multiple micronutrients over iron-folate. However, our review does indicate that multiple micronutrient administration is associated with a significant reduction in SGA births in comparison with iron-folate administration (9% and 12% reduction in the fixed and random effects models, respectively).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation