Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Multiple-micronutrient supplementation for women during pregnancy
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
142
22
19
4
Citation Types
2
98
3
7
Year Published
Range
2003
20032025
2025Publication Types
Select...
147
21
13
2
Relationship
12
171
Authors
Journals
Cited by 183 publications
(110 citation statements)
References 82 publications
2
98
3
7
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These findings are comparable to the results of the systematic review of UNIMAPP trials [37] (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82 â 0.99) based on 12 studies, which are also included in our analysis. These findings are however, different from our previous Cochrane review which was based on a limited set of studies [14] and reported a non-significant effect on SGA (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93 â 1.17). Our current data are also at variance with a recent meta-analysis by Shah et al [38] which analyzed results from only 5 RCTs and reported a statistically insignificant impact on SGA (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77 â 1.01).…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These findings corroborates those from earlier reviews [14,36] which also revealed no significant benefit of multiple micronutrients over iron-folate. However, our review does indicate that multiple micronutrient administration is associated with a significant reduction in SGA births in comparison with iron-folate administration (9% and 12% reduction in the fixed and random effects models, respectively).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These findings are comparable to the results of the systematic review of UNIMAPP trials [37] (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82 â 0.99) based on 12 studies, which are also included in our analysis. These findings are however, different from our previous Cochrane review which was based on a limited set of studies [14] and reported a non-significant effect on SGA (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93 â 1.17). Our current data are also at variance with a recent meta-analysis by Shah et al [38] which analyzed results from only 5 RCTs and reported a statistically insignificant impact on SGA (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77 â 1.01).…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These findings corroborates those from earlier reviews [14,36] which also revealed no significant benefit of multiple micronutrients over iron-folate. However, our review does indicate that multiple micronutrient administration is associated with a significant reduction in SGA births in comparison with iron-folate administration (9% and 12% reduction in the fixed and random effects models, respectively).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This size difference is consistent with a 53-g increment and RR of 0.86 for LBW obtained from systematic reviews of MM supplementation trials across low-income regions, including South Asia. 13,15,29 However, unlike findings from overviews, 13,25,26 we found little difference in the risk of infants born small for gestational age and thus attribute observed gains in size to longer gestation. Antenatal MM supplementation may have affected gestational and fetal nutrition through metabolic pathways other than those regulated by iron and folate.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, trials have often not been designed or powered to detect differences in later infant mortality or multiple maternalfetal and infant outcomes. 25,26 Among those that have, our finding is not consistent with an 18% reduction in 3-month infant mortality after antenatal MM vs iron-folic acid supplementation in Indonesia 15 or a significant reduction in infant mortality to a year elsewhere in Bangladesh when MM supplementation was combined with food provision early (although not later) in pregnancy. 27 We observed, however, differences in risk of adverse birth outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 74%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The increase in birthweight and reduction in LBW and SGA births was consistent with the results of an earlier meta-analysis [9] and with other, more recent trials [29, 30]. There was no increase in other birth measurements.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These findings are comparable to the results of the systematic review of UNIMAPP trials [37] (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82 â 0.99) based on 12 studies, which are also included in our analysis. These findings are however, different from our previous Cochrane review which was based on a limited set of studies [14] and reported a non-significant effect on SGA (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93 â 1.17). Our current data are also at variance with a recent meta-analysis by Shah et al [38] which analyzed results from only 5 RCTs and reported a statistically insignificant impact on SGA (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77 â 1.01).…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These findings corroborates those from earlier reviews [14,36] which also revealed no significant benefit of multiple micronutrients over iron-folate. However, our review does indicate that multiple micronutrient administration is associated with a significant reduction in SGA births in comparison with iron-folate administration (9% and 12% reduction in the fixed and random effects models, respectively).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This size difference is consistent with a 53-g increment and RR of 0.86 for LBW obtained from systematic reviews of MM supplementation trials across low-income regions, including South Asia. 13,15,29 However, unlike findings from overviews, 13,25,26 we found little difference in the risk of infants born small for gestational age and thus attribute observed gains in size to longer gestation. Antenatal MM supplementation may have affected gestational and fetal nutrition through metabolic pathways other than those regulated by iron and folate.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, trials have often not been designed or powered to detect differences in later infant mortality or multiple maternalfetal and infant outcomes. 25,26 Among those that have, our finding is not consistent with an 18% reduction in 3-month infant mortality after antenatal MM vs iron-folic acid supplementation in Indonesia 15 or a significant reduction in infant mortality to a year elsewhere in Bangladesh when MM supplementation was combined with food provision early (although not later) in pregnancy. 27 We observed, however, differences in risk of adverse birth outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 74%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The increase in birthweight and reduction in LBW and SGA births was consistent with the results of an earlier meta-analysis [9] and with other, more recent trials [29, 30]. There was no increase in other birth measurements.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These findings are comparable to the results of the systematic review of UNIMAPP trials [37] (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82 â 0.99) based on 12 studies, which are also included in our analysis. These findings are however, different from our previous Cochrane review which was based on a limited set of studies [14] and reported a non-significant effect on SGA (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.93 â 1.17). Our current data are also at variance with a recent meta-analysis by Shah et al [38] which analyzed results from only 5 RCTs and reported a statistically insignificant impact on SGA (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77 â 1.01).…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…These findings corroborates those from earlier reviews [14,36] which also revealed no significant benefit of multiple micronutrients over iron-folate. However, our review does indicate that multiple micronutrient administration is associated with a significant reduction in SGA births in comparison with iron-folate administration (9% and 12% reduction in the fixed and random effects models, respectively).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This size difference is consistent with a 53-g increment and RR of 0.86 for LBW obtained from systematic reviews of MM supplementation trials across low-income regions, including South Asia. 13,15,29 However, unlike findings from overviews, 13,25,26 we found little difference in the risk of infants born small for gestational age and thus attribute observed gains in size to longer gestation. Antenatal MM supplementation may have affected gestational and fetal nutrition through metabolic pathways other than those regulated by iron and folate.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…13 However, trials have often not been designed or powered to detect differences in later infant mortality or multiple maternalfetal and infant outcomes. 25,26 Among those that have, our finding is not consistent with an 18% reduction in 3-month infant mortality after antenatal MM vs iron-folic acid supplementation in Indonesia 15 or a significant reduction in infant mortality to a year elsewhere in Bangladesh when MM supplementation was combined with food provision early (although not later) in pregnancy. 27 We observed, however, differences in risk of adverse birth outcomes.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 74%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The increase in birthweight and reduction in LBW and SGA births was consistent with the results of an earlier meta-analysis [9] and with other, more recent trials [29, 30]. There was no increase in other birth measurements.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 90%