2005
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth756
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms

Abstract: Microarray technology is a powerful tool for measuring RNA expression for thousands of genes at once. Various studies have been published comparing competing platforms with mixed results: some find agreement, others do not. As the number of researchers starting to use microarrays and the number of cross-platform meta-analysis studies rapidly increases, appropriate platform assessments become more important. Here we present results from a comparison study that offers important improvements over those previously… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
580
2
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 792 publications
(606 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
19
580
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…2,27 However, some infectious agents may also induce Th1 proliferation through TNFRSF4 signals. 22,28 In the context of allergy, however, recall responses were shown to be dependent on TNFRSF4 signals in an animal model of asthma. 29 TNFRSF4 has therefore been suggested as a therapeutic candidate in allergic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,27 However, some infectious agents may also induce Th1 proliferation through TNFRSF4 signals. 22,28 In the context of allergy, however, recall responses were shown to be dependent on TNFRSF4 signals in an animal model of asthma. 29 TNFRSF4 has therefore been suggested as a therapeutic candidate in allergic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because IDR analysis is sensitive to the quality of replicates (Li et al 2011), to provide a more systematic comparison we generated a CAT plot (Irizarry et al 2005), including the comparison of each sample (Fig. 6A).…”
Section: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press On May 12 2018 -Publishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the work up procedure was very similar, the observed differences were probably more due to the platform and to the different probes than to the processes involved in amplification and hybridization. 46 Accordingly, additional methods were used to confirm mRNA expression data. The lower variation of spotted glass slide array is most likely due to the much lower dynamic rang of the FIGURE 3 -Real-time PCR analysis of selected genes that were modulated in LT97 cells by AE treatment according to cDNA microarrays: Effects of AE on the expression levels of GSTP1, GSTT2, GSTA4, UGT1A1 and UGT2B7 mRNA are shown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%