1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2541(98)00122-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiple fluid generations in the Sudbury igneous complex: fluid inclusion, Ar, O, H, Rb and Sr evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison, Fe, Mn, Pb and Ba are present only in trace (<10 ppm) concentrations in the deep groundwaters of the Sudbury area (Frape and Fritz 1982) and the ore metals detected in the P brine inclusions could clearly not have been derived from the groundwaters. Therefore, models describing the interaction of heated groundwater with sulfide, or mixing of groundwater with a second fluid of magmatic origin exsolved from the SIC or from a sulfide liquid are supported by our new observations (Li 1993;Farrow 1994;Marshall et al 1999;Hanley et al 2004). …”
Section: Origin Of the Brine-ch 4 Assemblagesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For comparison, Fe, Mn, Pb and Ba are present only in trace (<10 ppm) concentrations in the deep groundwaters of the Sudbury area (Frape and Fritz 1982) and the ore metals detected in the P brine inclusions could clearly not have been derived from the groundwaters. Therefore, models describing the interaction of heated groundwater with sulfide, or mixing of groundwater with a second fluid of magmatic origin exsolved from the SIC or from a sulfide liquid are supported by our new observations (Li 1993;Farrow 1994;Marshall et al 1999;Hanley et al 2004). …”
Section: Origin Of the Brine-ch 4 Assemblagesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Minor hydrothermal fluid flow beneath the Complex was also initiated by heating footwall ground waters with recharge from deep formational brines (Fig. 3;Farrow, 1994;Farrow and Watkinson, 1999;Marshall et al, 1999;Watkinson, 1999) as has been recorded in other impact structures (e.g., Komor et al, 1988;Pevzner et al, 1992;Masaytis and Naumov, 1995). The hydrothermal circulation system altered the crater-fill deposits around the entire circumference of the exposed structure (>6,000 km 3 ), mainly altering the vitric fragments in the fragmental rocks (Ames, 1999;Ames et al, 2000).…”
Section: Sudbury Structure Hydrothermal Systemmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Olivine melagabbronorites, the host rocks in the Tootoo and Mequillon magmatic sulfide deposits, were pervasively altered to hydrous mineral assemblages dominated by chlorite, tremolite-actinolite, and relict late-magmatic hornblende that are consistent with greenschist facies metamorphism [22]. Large-scale and very saline hydrothermal fluid activity is also interpreted to have affected rocks of the Sudbury Complex and in the process caused remobilization of both base metals and PGEs [105,106].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%