2000
DOI: 10.1080/016502500383368
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Newborn looking toward novel stimuli containing a single or two novel dimensions was assessed in two studies. In Study 1, newborns were habituated to a visual stimulus containing stimulus movement and line orientation information. Following habituation, stimuli containing two novel dimensions were attended to more than stimuli containing a single novel dimension. It was also demonstrated that newborns detect stimulus movement changes. In Study 2, stimuli containing novel colour and line orientation information… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding implies highly efficient mechanisms that are functional at birth to rapidly detect and discriminate salient visual stimuli, and to subsequently learn characteristics of these stimuli (Slater et al, 1998;Slater, Bremner, Johnson, Sherwood, Hayes & Brown, 2000). Moreover, neonates have been shown to process compound stimuli as composed of a combination of attributes, indicating that at birth, infants attend to multiple aspects of individual displays (LaPlante et al, 2000;Slater, Brown & Badenoch, 1997).…”
Section: The Second Assumption: Learning Object Properties Derives Frmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding implies highly efficient mechanisms that are functional at birth to rapidly detect and discriminate salient visual stimuli, and to subsequently learn characteristics of these stimuli (Slater et al, 1998;Slater, Bremner, Johnson, Sherwood, Hayes & Brown, 2000). Moreover, neonates have been shown to process compound stimuli as composed of a combination of attributes, indicating that at birth, infants attend to multiple aspects of individual displays (LaPlante et al, 2000;Slater, Brown & Badenoch, 1997).…”
Section: The Second Assumption: Learning Object Properties Derives Frmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It has been claimed that infants younger than 4 to 6 weeks of age lack cortical mechanisms subserving motion discrimination, a claim based in part on infants' preferential looking toward one side of a stimulus containing regions moving in opposite directions vs a uniform pattern on the other side (Wattam-Bell, 1991, 1996a. In contrast to the Wattam-Bell experiments, evidence suggesting early motion sensitivity was obtained by LaPlante, Orr, Neville, Vorkapich and Sasso (1996) and Laplante, Orr, Vorkapich and Neville (2000) who demonstrated discrimination of translational and rotational direction in neonates, and Náñez (1988), who reported avoidance responses to looming stimuli in 3-week-olds. These apparently conflicting findings may be reconciled by considering that evidence of motion sensitivity in a particular experimental paradigm is strongly dependent on stimulus characteristics (e.g.…”
Section: The Model Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%