2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00531-005-0498-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiphase salt tectonic evolution in NW Germany: seismic interpretation and retro-deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brink et al, 1992;Baldschuhn et al, 1996;Kossow & Krawczyk, 2002;von Hartmann, 2003;Maystrenko etal., 2005). Rare 3D re£ection seismic measurements were carried out on a much smaller scale (von Hartmann, 2003;Mohr et al, 2005). 2D seismic cross-sections are subject to spatial artefacts: the re£ection patterns are a¡ected by marginal e¡ects, the pro¢les do not necessarily run per-pendicular to the strike direction of the structural elements, and section balancing and calculation of material loss are arguable when mobile salt structures are involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Brink et al, 1992;Baldschuhn et al, 1996;Kossow & Krawczyk, 2002;von Hartmann, 2003;Maystrenko etal., 2005). Rare 3D re£ection seismic measurements were carried out on a much smaller scale (von Hartmann, 2003;Mohr et al, 2005). 2D seismic cross-sections are subject to spatial artefacts: the re£ection patterns are a¡ected by marginal e¡ects, the pro¢les do not necessarily run per-pendicular to the strike direction of the structural elements, and section balancing and calculation of material loss are arguable when mobile salt structures are involved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These faults were apparently weakly developed and did not penetrate the evaporites. Nevertheless, these ductile layers already began moving in Early Triassic times evidenced by studies on the Hunte High (Strunck et al 1998) and in the Ostfriesland area (Mohr et al 2004(Mohr et al , 2005.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is important to stress that in this work the objective is not to gain geological insight on the region; the simplified section is used to show the capabilities of the numerical techniques presented so far. Panels (a) and (b) of Figure 5 show seismic data and the geological interpretation provided by [24] (modified from their Figure 6). Examples of well-resolved contacts (interfaces that can be univocally located based on the seismic data) and poorly resolved features were added to their Figure. Label 3 and 4 show two poorly resolved features: the smoothness of the lateral contact of the salt body with surrounding rocks and the thickness of the salt layer that crosses the section.…”
Section: Temperature Field In a Geological Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%