2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0000960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiobjective Analysis of Green-Blue Water Uses in a Highly Utilized Basin: Case Study of Pangani Basin, Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion of nutrient elimination and GHG emissions in multicriteria optimization regimes and quantitative trade-off analyses would be a major step towards achieving sustainable dam construction across entire river basins. These methods to manage trade-offs have successfully have been applied to enable water availability or hydroelectricity generation, as well as to maintain flows for river ecosystems 187,188 . Such optimization regimes have also been applied to dam-removal scenarios in the Willamette River basin (Oregon, USA), where it was shown that removing 12 dams would hydrologically reconnect 52% of the basin while only eliminating 1.6% of the water-storage capacity and hydroelectricity production 189 .…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of nutrient elimination and GHG emissions in multicriteria optimization regimes and quantitative trade-off analyses would be a major step towards achieving sustainable dam construction across entire river basins. These methods to manage trade-offs have successfully have been applied to enable water availability or hydroelectricity generation, as well as to maintain flows for river ecosystems 187,188 . Such optimization regimes have also been applied to dam-removal scenarios in the Willamette River basin (Oregon, USA), where it was shown that removing 12 dams would hydrologically reconnect 52% of the basin while only eliminating 1.6% of the water-storage capacity and hydroelectricity production 189 .…”
Section: Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) are one such tool for assessing the trade-offs between water users in a river basin. MOEAs use stochastic search tools to simultaneously find the Pareto approximate set across multiple objectives (Reed et al, 2013;Matrosov et al, 2015;Hurford et al, 2020;Zatarain Salazar et al, 2016;Kiptala et al, 2018). The Pareto approximate or non-dominated set of solutions are the suite of solutions for which increasing the water allocation to one user leads to a reduction in the benefit to others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of the studies where MOEAs have been applied, the e-flow objective in the simulation component of the model either meets a minimum flow release (Zatarain Salazar et al, 2017;Gonzalez et al, 2021;Kiptala et al, 2018;Hurford et al, 2020) or minimizes the deviation of flow from the natural, unregulated flow regime . The former objective, minimum flow releases, fails to thoroughly capture the essence of e-flows which are the "quantity, timing, and quality of freshwater flows and levels required to sustain aquatic ecosystems" (The Brisbane Declaration and Global Action Agenda on Environmental Flows, 2018, cited in Arthington et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pareto approximate or nondominated set of solutions are the suite of solutions for which increasing the water allocation to one user leads to a reduction in the benefit to others. EMODPS uses multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs), stochastic search tools to simultaneously find the Pareto approximate set across multiple objectives (Reed et al, 2013;Matrosov et al, 2015;Zatarain Salazar et al, 2016;Kiptala et al, 2018;Hurford et al, 2020). The advantage of MOEAs is that they do not require pre-specifying preferences across objectives, thereby supporting unbiased a posteriori decision making (Reed et al, 2013;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of the studies where MOEAs have been applied, the e-flow objective in the simulation component of the model either meets a minimum flow release (Zatarain Salazar et al, 2017;Kiptala et al, 2018;Hurford et al, 2020;Gonzalez et al, 2021) or minimizes the deviation of flow from the natural, unregulated flow regime . The former objective, minimum flow releases, fails to thoroughly capture the essence of e-flows which are the "quantity, timing, and quality of freshwater flows and levels required to sustain aquatic ecosystems" (Brisbane Declaration, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%